Top Stories

Brazil 1, South Africa 0: The game-winning goal

Dani Alves (GettyImages)

South Africa fought hard and pushed Brazil to the brink in Thursday's Confederation's Cup semifinals, but ultimately a questionable free kick call and a brilliant shot by Barcelona's Dani Alves kept South Africa from pulling off the second upset of the semifinals.

Now we could focus on Ramires going down like a sniper shot him (U.S. fans will remember these same antics leading to the free kick that produced Brazil's first goal vs. the United States), but instead we will watch Alves hit a beautiful free kick.

What did you think of the goal? Disappointed to see that free kick called? Are you liking the U.S. national team's chances in the final after seeing Brazil struggle vs. South Africa?

Share your thoughts below.

Comments

  1. the brazil goal did not come on a flop. that was a rash challenge by a defender who didn’t know he and his teammates had the player under control. that play showed a total lack of feel for the stage of the match and removed control of the outcome from south africa’s play to the referee’s whistle.

    arguably, south africa should have already been up at least a goal by that time. poor finishing, and questionable attacking decisions late in the match unnecessarily gave brazil additional positions and increased the pressure on the south african defense.

    i think that if they made it into overtime, which was clearly the coach’s plan, who knows what would have happened. what we do know is that a combination of poor calls (i’ve seen some references to the muggings of pienaar and other SA midfielders that went unnoticed by the referee), poor attacking judgment, and undisciplined defending around the box spelled their downfall.

    Reply
  2. Oh pity, I´m so sorry about the five times champ, 4 times-in-the-finals of confed cups, so mean and flopping brazil. What a

    contrast against the victim USA. Oh and someone even said that Italy & germany included in the same diving consortia

    all vs kpoor good old US.

    It doesn´t come to paulo´s, josh etc mind that south americans are acute dribblers and refs

    do NOT call many fouls but SOME should be

    whistled at last! Game after game be it Egypt, italy, brazil or spain it´s the same

    salestalk of commentators. Cut that talk, go down to the pitch vs brazil and play more soccer. Or should the yellows line up marta too?

    Reply
  3. Pico, you are kidding, right? First of all, you state that I am projecting some type of “holier than thou” attitude. That’s an unsupportable assumption. You say that to cast doubt on my argument by suggesting that I am biased. I CRINGED and turned away when Donovan embellished the bump at the end of the Spain game. You ASSUMED that I was a hypocrite, without knowing. I hate diving in any sport. Diving and winning games by flopping does not show who the deserving team is on the day, regardless of whether it is “my” team.

    And second, could you please quote the exact sentence in which I drew an analogy between flopping and racism? Best I could tell, I said “It may be a part of the game, but in a lot of parts of the world, racism is a part of the game. That doesn’t mean that it should continue to be a part of the game.” I didn’t say flopping was like racism. I pointed out a part of the game that shouldn’t be a part of the game, even if it is often found in the game. Occasionally, performance-enhancing substances are found “in the game,” but that does not mean that we should not take measures to prevent that from happening.

    Your “P.S.” was an insult, and about as close to a “holier than thou” attitude as you will find on this thread. I know that racism is far more serious than flopping will ever be. All I said was that neither belonged in the beautiful game.

    Reply
  4. Issuing cards or other punishment after games sounds like a good idea but I think it’s a slippery slope that FIFA will discuss. In assessing whether or not a player flopped, you’d have to determine what his intentions were to call it fairly because a black and white rule wouldn’t work. If you look at the ‘foul’ that led to the first goal of the Brazil v. US game, I think the guy just tripped and it was never his intention to draw a call. If some FIFA official then suspended the guy for flopping because there was no contact, you’d have quite a few unhappy Brazilians.

    We all can probably agree that trying to determine intention when issuing red cards for dangerous tackles is incredibly sticky so why would FIFA put themselves in another tough situation?

    Reply
  5. Ko’d,

    I thought long and hard about calling you an idiot, because I knew I would get your first paragraph response. Internet etiquette is overly sensitive to namecalling when it serves to call attention and is actually backed up with substance. Yes, I believe I would have said that in soccer bar in real life because I find your point preposterous, but that is not the argument.

    Your initial comment, to which I was referring, HAD no context. It was in direct response to Paulo’s prediction that the US would lose. The fact that you and Paulo “made nice”, which I noted, is completely irrelevant. He seems to be a much easier going guy than I and more dismissive of idiotic responses than I.

    “I still believe, as I have for the past week and a half, that real fans wouldn’t predict that their team will lose.” – ko’d

    THIS, and only this, is what makes you an idiot. You’re effectively telling people they aren’t fans because they acknowledge that a US win would be an upset. I am reduced to namecalling because there is no substantive debate that could possibly sway you. This is an “opinion” so ridiculous that it can’t even be argued against. In fact, I am in utter disbelief that you can even call yourself a real fan by this definition. Not predicting the US to lose is logically equivalent to predicting the US to win. You, therefore, if you are a “real fan” by your definition, predict the US to win every game. If this was a true prediction, that you believed with some certainty, you might be willing to even bet on it. I don’t believe you would do that.

    I am neither disputing your soccer knowledge, nor your fandom. But unless you can admit that statement was ill-conceived, you are an idiot, by the literal definition of the word.

    Reply
  6. it was a garbage free kick call – Brazil mugged Pienaar all game long with very few of them called. I am sick of hearing of “jogo bonito” – it died in Brazil a long time ago (at least with the Selecao). More hype than anything with the most overrated player of all time in Kaka.

    Reply
  7. To all those complaining about flopping in football and your “I am holier than thou” attitude. It is part of the game and the more American players apply their trade in the bigger leagues the more they are going to learn from it and use it to their advantage. Jozy already does it. Dempsey does it too. Donovan sometimes does it and he is not even in Europe.

    The funny thing is that the day the US gets a favorable call in a big game under the same circumstances, those same detractors are going to be lauding the player’s ingenuity and savvy to pull that off.

    And it is not just an issue with football but you see it all the time in the NBA and NFL. Players trying to embellish in order to try to get a call.

    Like anything, it is maddening and frustrating when it goes against your team, but you are willing to look the other way when it benefits you. There is a word for it and it starts with “h”.

    Cheers

    P.S. And do not try to make an analogy between flopping and racism. One if part of the game and the other one is a social disease.

    Reply
  8. I’m really worried about today’s game with the referee; I only hoping that his decisions don’t influence the game. Is it that difficult really? Just call a fair game, that’s all we ask.

    About the being a fan thing, I’m a huge fan; Brazil is the favorite, so what? I go USA all the way and it’s being this way even when the odds are not in our favor. That’s what makes an upset sweeter, the fact that you can say “I told you so”.

    Reply
  9. ko’d, BossTweed:

    Come on guys, make up!

    I’ll disagree with ko’d in his argument that a “real fan” wouldn’t predict his team losing … I think of myself as a true fan even though I think we’ll lose. But I can see his side as well … and I definitely don’t feel good about calling the loss.

    Reply
  10. Brazil’s play is getting worse. Our play is getting better. Brazil had one less day of rest. We have one more day of rest. I’m just saying.

    More importantly, my wife is Brazilian. I’m American. Please God, oh please God, let this be the day! I want our 2 boys (1 and 3) to want to play for the USA and not be motivated to pull a Rossi!

    A win here could do it!

    Reply
  11. I think there is a fine line between simulation, and flopping to get a call.

    A good example is Jozy’s earned PK in the Italy game. He WAS fouled, but he embellished it to ensure that we got the call.

    I’m actually okay with it, and I do it when I play competitive games. If my jersey is getting tugged, or my ankle is getting stepped on, I’m going to ground more often than not, because I can’t trust the referee to get the call right.

    That’s what it looked like Ramires did in that specific instance to me.

    Now, stuff like Toni (or Iaquinta?) vs. Australia in 2006, or Eto’o in the Champions League final a couple of years back???

    That stuff has to go, and I think post game reviews with fines/suspensions would solve it quick.

    Reply
  12. That was a terrible foul call,especially that close to the goal at that time in the game. I’ve seen worse fouls not called at all. Matter of fact a couple of runs that S.A. made in which their players were cut from behind to stop the fast break that could have been yellow or even red.

    Reply
  13. The more I learn about FIFA’s corruption and the way these games are refereed, the more dislike I obtain for the international game.

    I suppose in the end it makes it all that much more important to be so much better than the other teams that a twelfth man with a whistle can’t take you down. Being even or slightly better isn’t enough to win you tournaments

    Reply
  14. BossTweed,

    First, thanks for joining the discussion by immediately calling me names. You seem like a class act. I am sure you would do the same thing if we were having this conversation at an official U.S. Soccer Bar, in person.

    Second, you weren’t paying attention, and completely missed the context of what I said. I stated, and I am sure Paulo will agree with me on this (we already made nice): “The only real evidence we have is that you are predicting a loss based on ‘realism.'” I was referring to evidence of who was the bigger U.S. fan, not evidence supporting a prediction that the U.S. would lose. Indeed, if you read further, Paulo and I then engaged in a discussion of what evidence there was to predict a U.S. loss. It was fruitful. Your comment was functionally worthless.

    And yes, I still believe, as I have for the past week and a half, that real fans wouldn’t predict that their team will lose. That’s my opinion-others clearly disagree. But it doesn’t make me an idiot.

    Congratulations on adding absolutely nothing to the present discussion.

    Reply
  15. Having played the beautiful game it breaks my heart to see all this flopping and that the fans have just adopted it as part of the game. I wish players were carded more for “sniper” dives. It is pretty pathetic when the WWE has more realistic contact then soccer games. Now that I am not blinded by pure joy I also am really PO’d about that red card against M Bradley. Any other ref in the world knows that it probably wasn’t even a foul. Just some ref trying to slow down the stars and stripes. GO USMNT!!!

    Reply
  16. ko’d:

    Per your early comments; you’re an idiot. How else should one make a prediction EXCEPT in accordance with “realism”. Predicting that you’re team will lose doesn’t mean you want them to lose. All he was doing was acknowledging that the US beating Brazil would be an upset. If you can’t accept that, it doesn’t make you a better fan, just delusional.

    Reply
  17. @ko’d…brilliant post.

    I was going to recommend the same thing; post-game yellows for players who go down without being touched (simulation). I can think of a few examples where players were clearly trying to gain a huge advantage – Egypt’s keeper against Brazil in the beginning of the game, some Brazilians, and frankly LD’s flop at the end against Spain. Players would stop if they found out that an extra yellow and caution accumulation would keep them out (e.g. LD would be out of the final). I’m not saying he should be out of the final, I’m saying that next year’s WC or internationals after the WC need to start the rule.

    I was thinking less along the lines of racism and more ice hockey. Fighting was eliminated from the international game a long time ago, and it has largely disappeared from important NHL games because of the game misconduct rules/instigator rules, 3rd man in etc. And when this was done many people said it’s part of the game, the culture, you can’t stop it etc. etc. And the game is so much better now that the rules have been implemented.

    Soccer can be the same way. There is nothing worse than big tournaments being decided by reds, dodgy penalty kicks and free kicks within danger distance; simulated injuries to the head or knee when the replays show a player wasn’t even breathed on, etc. There is so much pressure on referees already.

    Reply
  18. On the whole, the US team doesn’t flop…..but Dempsey sure looks like he picked a lot up from the EPL. He actually does 2 flops: one where he realizes that he can’t make a move to get past a defender, and one when he’s already been stripped.

    Both flops require him to lay prone on the ground for 30 second clips. Yes!

    Reply
  19. I’m wondering if the weather will have any influence on the game. Remember, it’s the southern hemisphere’s late fall. It was in the 30s for the US v. Spain game.

    Did the cold temps have some impact on how sluggish Spain looked at the outset? Did it have a similar effect on Brazil?

    If it gets really chilly, could that help our boys surprise Brazil early if they, too, are hampered by the cold?

    Reply
  20. Luke in NC: I totally agree. It makes me so angry. I am a pretty clear-headed person (I think) but I am starting to think there is some type of conspiracy. 3 reds in 4 games? All three were questionable red cards, 1 was definitely a yellow card (Klejstan), but Bradley’s card was ridiculous. Someone mentioned that between Gooch, DeMerit, Clark and Bradley, there were two previous fouls the ENTIRE game against Spain.

    I wish there was some appeal process for the red card, but my impression is that it is just going through the motions. The standard is too high. The refs change the complexion of the game, and they have no business doing that. As Donovan said after the Italy game, 22 players come ready to perform, and the referee simply doesn’t.

    Reply
  21. One of my favorite US flops in recent memory was late in the Spain game, Jozy had the ball by himself on the sideline in the offensive third with no support within about 20 yards of him. A Spain defender came over and *barely* grazed him. Jozy fell over like he was rooted in concrete and tossed off the Brooklyn Bridge.

    Both my brother and I burst out laughing when this happened as he got the call from Jorge.

    Reply
  22. Paulo, fair enough. I like that we can take pride in our passion for the team.

    As for free discussion, I disagree with some of your assumptions. I am not convinced that Brazil will play a better game than it did against South Africa, just because it played poorly. I see some real problems with the current Brazil team–problems that have been highlighted by other viewers/commenters/analysts, but not exploited by the U.S. team last time.

    I agree that we will miss Bradley. He has been influential in a lot of our goals, and has controlled play in the midfield. But I am not ready to say that his loss, if using Feilhaber as a replacement, dooms us. By the way, I am going out on a limb here and saying that Michael Bradley may prove to be one of the greatest players in MNT history at National and club team levels–but that is a pure aside.

    We may not have a size advantage, but I am not sure that Brazil, conversely, therefore has the size advantage. We have some big boys on the back line: Spector, DeMerit, Gooch, and Boacanegra. Free kicks? Sure-that’s a Brazil strength and lately, a bit of a weakness for the U.S. That much is clear. But I am pretty confident in the way the USMNT has turned things around, worked on organization, etc. I don’t feel that size will be critical to the game’s outcome.

    Finally, sometimes there is a letdown after a huge win. But the U.S. had a huge win against Egypt, and then beat Spain. Looking at the way they played in both games, I have a good feeling about their direction and, more importantly, their focus. I don’t just think the U.S. CAN beat Brazil. Technically, any team CAN beat Brazil. I think the team is READY to beat Brazil.

    Reply
  23. The final will be a study in contrasts: Brazil gets all the calls, even on the worst flops, while the US gets the red cards, even on the cleanest tackles.

    Being the host nation kept South Africa in the other semifinal–Brazil’s flopping would have earned any other team three reds. (I kid, and I don’t want to take away from SA’s tough performance!)

    Reply
  24. I just gotta get it out and say that i’m still pissed about the BS red card.

    Star players/teams always get some favor now and then….but is it just me or is soccer way more biased toward its big stars than most sports?

    Then number of crap calls (that have such a huge impact) against us and for teams like Brazil seem criminal and can sap the joy out of the sport.

    Regardless, you definitely gotta give credit to Brazil for making the most out of the penalties they “win.”

    Reply
  25. Whether you love or hate Brazil, that was a spectacular thing to see. Brazil provides yet another magical moment.

    GO USA!!!

    Reply
  26. ko’d:

    Ok, let’s just drop it and assume that we’re both huge fans … otherwise we wouldn’t even be on this blog, correct?

    My opinion is that we’ll lose based on the assumption that 1)Brazil will play a better game against us then it did against South Africa, 2)We will really feel the loss of Bradley … and his ability to break up plays will not be substituted by whoever comes in to take his place, 3)Unlike vs Spain, we don’t have an advantage against Brazil’s size, 4)There tends to be a letdown after a huge win.

    Yes, you can come in here and tell me that Team USA is supremely confident, Feilhaber will posses the ball better than Bradley, etc etc and we will win the game. I sure as HECK hope that happens … but my gut feeling is that we’ll lose a close game.

    Reply
  27. Ives:

    What is the review process for referees post-game?

    How the F is this Uruguayan Ref still calling high-level games …

    The call on Bradley was absolutely criminal.

    Reply
  28. Paulo, you have no support for that assertion. None. And the only evidence we have is what you have said so far on this blog. I won’t even make the directly contradictory statement that I am a bigger fan than you are because 1) I have no support for that because I don’t know you and 2) how do you measure that type of thing.

    The only real evidence we have is that you are predicting a loss based on “realism.” The team must love that attitude.

    Reply
  29. I think people are going to realize how much our Nats will miss Michael Bradley in the next game. Nobody in the Nats pool is as solid and well-rounded in the midfield as Bradley Jr. is.

    I’m not as confidant without him playing.

    Reply
  30. Absolutely not. I think I might struggle to support a team that “flops” and “wastes time.” It may be a part of the game, but in a lot of parts of the world, racism is a part of the game. That doesn’t mean that it should continue to be a part of the game.

    I think players should be disciplined with suspensions if post-game review shows that there is no contact on called-fouls. It might be hard to determine whether there is really a foul when there IS contact, but look at the Bradley foul before Brazil went ahead of the U.S. 1-0. No contact. At all.

    Reply
  31. All you Italian haters should have watched the Italy/Brazil game… It was pretty clear that Brazil was flopping and diving a whole lot more than the Italians.

    Reply
  32. I agree that Brazil flops, but it’s not as bad (or as obvious, should I say) as the Italians …

    It’s disgraceful, but it’s part of the game. I actually think that once Team USA learns to “flop” and “waste time” like Brazil, Italy, Germany, etc … THAT is when we’ll know that the team has reached the upper echelons of soccer …

    Reply
  33. I like our chances against a team we’ve recently seen, especially right after we’ve shut down a better team. I really hope to see a Clark / Feilhaber midfield.

    Reply
  34. And Paulo…last time I checked, the majority of the people on this blog said that the U.S. would lose to Egypt. And to Spain. You don’t get to say “Go Red, White, and Blue” after a comment like “I think we’ll lose (Brazil will likely rebound from a moribund performance). Not trying to be pessimistic … just realistic.”

    Reply
  35. I have heard criticism in the past that Dempsey dives/flops. I haven’t seen much (if any) of that. On the whole, I think the United States plays with integrity. They don’t roll around on the ground like they were hit by a truck, even if there IS a tough foul on them.

    Brazil is notorious for flopping when a defender’s foot gets within 2 yards of them. And that is how they score goals like the one last night? Or the first goal against the United States a week ago? In my opinion, it is disgraceful. For all the step-overs and perfect touches, it is all ruined by what can be aptly described as “cheating.”

    The United States may lose more often. And they may not get the free-kick calls in dangerous places. But at least they play the game with some dignity.

    Reply
  36. I think we’ll lose (Brazil will likely rebound from a moribund performance). Not trying to be pessimistic … just realistic.

    Go Red, White, and Blue!

    Reply

Leave a Comment