Top Stories

What is your ideal format for the MLS All-Star Game?

MLS20110727026

Photo by ISIphotos.com

With every passing year, the format for the MLS All-Star Game seems to continue to be a point of contention among fans and media, but even with that, the 2012 version won't be providing any drastic changes.

While officially awarding this year's game to Philadelphia, the league announced that it will maintain its unique MLS vs. foreign club format for the eight straight year (and ninth out of the last 10). There is no denying that the format has been successful from an attendance standpoint, as each of the last seven games have drawn announced sell-out crowds.

The game against Manchester United in 2010 drew more than 70,000 to Reliant Stadium in Houston, and the confines of PPL Park combined with the fervent fan support in the region practically guarantees that another capacity crowd will be on hand to see the top stars in MLS compete in the July exhibition.   

There are some who would argue, though, that the format is a bit obsolete because of all of the summer international friendlies MLS clubs play. In addition to that, some might say that MLS can more than hold its own at this point and doesn't need the lure of a European club to fill the seats with promise of quality entertainment.

In the early days of MLS the league used the typical-American-sports East vs. West format and even tested out a U.S. stars vs. International stars edition in 1998. In an effort to showcase more of the league's players and put less of a dependence on foreign clubs, perhaps it would be appropriate to shift back to either of those two arrangements.

With all that being said, what is your preferred format for the MLS All-Star Game? Cast your vote after the jump:

————

How did you vote? Which format do you prefer for the All-Star Game? Do you have a practical idea for an All-Star format that hasn't been explored yet? Do you like the current format and its uniqueness?

Share your thoughts below.

Comments

  1. All-Star games are usually pretty lame, so I’d be fine if they dropped it all together. The NBA, NFL and NHL All-Star games are unwatchable as far as I’m concerned.

    At least the MLS version has been a competitive game in recent years, but really, what’s the point? It’s a meaningless game.

    Reply
  2. Saw this idea posted on the MLS page, but it should be MLS all-stars vs. Team USA. Get all of the best AMERICAN players in one game. That’s a money-maker, it’s patriotic and would give the appropriate relaxed “all-star game” feel.

    The last thing these guys need is ANOTHER competitive game during the mid-season break.

    Reply
  3. Absolutely not. Passions would get out of hand creating a high risk of injury. In no way is that an appropriate reward for having a great year in MLS.

    Reply
  4. I would like to see two “All-Star” captains (Becks&Henry), pick sides like you would for a pick up game. You could make an event out of it on ESPN8 as the two pick sides (from a pool of preselected all-stars). Invite fans so they could boo/cheer selections. Have the players that get selected brought on stage, don the jersey and THROW DOWN! It would draw interest in the general media especially if it gets a little raucous, never a bad thing.

    Reply
  5. “The MLS All-Stars’ loss to Manchester United in the MLS All-Star Game earned a 0.5 U.S. rating and 781,000 viewers on ESPN2 July 27”

    Reply
  6. It would let the USMNT team get in another game. Fans get to see USMNT and their league all-stars. The players can have a bit of fun with the match since the All Stars do not have to go against a team that is playing together every day like Man United. Last, many of the USMNT had a start in MSL so it is a good chance to welcome some of them back. I dont see anyone getting upset if USMNT wins and if MLS wins its still a victory of sorts for US soccer since some of the players on the MLS team will be some of the younger guys in the USMNT pool as well.

    Reply
  7. The MLS All-Star Game has grown into a major spectacle the past few years. NFL’s has diminished, but they are also tinkering with different ideas nowadays.

    Reply
  8. What casual fans (and non-fans) actually watch it? The game gets its usual 0.whatever TV rating, and a good portion of the supporters in the stands are there for the international team. An All-Star game is not going to make them a fan of a MLS team. They will go on loving Man Utd. or Chelsea or Real Madrid, but they still won’t care about Philly or FC Dallas or anyone else.

    Reply
  9. There are only two sports in America that have all star games that any one cares about: baseball and basketball. Baseball is the most individual-driven team sport imaginable from a performance standpoint, and the NBA is the most individual-driven team sport imaginable from a marketing/entertainment standpoint.

    An all-star game in football or in soccer makes no sense, which is why almost no one seems to care about it. These are team sports in which team chemistry, tactics, and familiarity are absolutely essential to any form of coherent display.

    To take the best ideas from everone, MLS should partner with the Mexican League (/Premier League/other) and create a “Cup” between the MLS Cup Champions (Supporterss Shield preferably) and the other League champion. That would be bomb.

    You’re welcome.

    Reply
  10. I don’t really have an opinion on this. But I do have a question for all of the people who say “none.” Why is it a bad thing to give casual fans (and non-fans) an opportunity to see the league’s brightest stars on the field simultaneously?

    Reply
  11. I think there should be two matches: first the best from the west and east would face off for the chance to play a prestigious international team in the final.

    Reply
  12. I guess “No way” ended in 2003. 😉 See the link posted below for more.

    “The Mexican Priméra División has dabbled in All-Star Games in recent history, including some held on US soil. The “Bimbo Stars” match held in Monterrey in May 2003 used a format that included the Mexican nationals taking on the foreign contingent of players in that same league. Why not combine the two?”

    Reply
  13. No way, that Mexican clubs would release their players ?

    I am pretty sure if they made enough they would.

    So the question is how much could they benefit from this. I happen to think it would be quite a bit. US has a lot of people and a lot of money, and even most of the US soccer fans know very little about the Mexican leagues.

    Reply
  14. Isn’t the all star game just another chance to make some $$$? I don’t really pay too much attention to the all star game so I pick whichever one brings in the most money and does the most good for the league.

    Reply
  15. People want to see a shootout type of game. Not a defensive battle between two MLS All-Star sides that don’t have offensive cohesion or an MLS vs. Foreign Club format where the MLS is just being set up for a beating.

    Here’s my opinion: have an MLS East vs. MLS West setup. Most players that people consider to be star players are attacking. So don’t vote by position. Vote who the best players are in each conference, whether that number is 18 or 22 or whatever. This would likely lead to a lot of attacking players, therefore, little defense and a fun attacking match. Maybe it’s an awful idea but it’s fun in FIFA to line up two teams and put 10 strikers on the field.

    Reply
  16. If you mean MLS All-Stars vs. Mexican league All-Stars, I am 100% with you – it would be a great game for the bragging rights as to which league is the top league in Concacaf. However, if you mean, MLS All-Stars against best Mexican players that play in MLS, the team of MLS-based Mexican players would be rather underwhelming.

    Reply
  17. ACC-Big Ten Challenge vs a euro league like SPL, France or, Netherlands at first. Eventually moving to bigger leagues. With the all star site as the final premier game.

    Reply
  18. Agreed. I could not care less about this game and never watch it. As an All-Star player, I would feign injury or fatigue every single year to avoid risk of injury in a meaningless scrimmage crammed into the busiest time of year for most American players.

    Reply
  19. As far as the Allstar game, MLS also used to be more competitive. It seems that they try to balance the allstar team American/foreign players. A few years ago there were more American national team players in MLS, now they’re mostly in Europe. Maybe thats why the MLS team hasnt been competitive.

    Reply
  20. I wonder how much $$$ friendlies against Euro teams bring in? Is it much after all the expenses. MLS teams used to be more competitive a few years ago when they played their full teams. Now it seems like the 2nd half teams bring in backups and trialists to get slaughtered. That hurts reputation of MLS. If they’re not willing to make a respectable showing they should cancel these games.

    Reply
  21. MLS AS vs. MLS Alumni is brilliant. It would be difficult to get guys back to the states in July though. But just imagine this game being a way for us to see all of our “Yanks Abroad” talent come back to showcase their talents for the fans and league that gave them their start.

    Reply
  22. No, the All-Star games has proven to be a hit in American sports, including soccer. To drop it would be a wasted opportunity to grow the game.

    Reply
  23. I like the current MLS AS v. ____ concept. The Mexico AS idea does have its appeal but I think rotating the opposition around the world keeps the various constituencies interested, and avoids a diminishing returns/dependency situation. I’d not be wanting to play FMF every year any more than Man U, and maybe this year team “X” is sexier because of their quality or some American signing(s) that deepen domestic interest.

    I disagree strongly that individual team friendlies “cover it.” I tend to tune out my own team’s friendlies because I view them as strictly cash cows. I know we won’t play our best for 90 mid-season, and I know the opponent is in pre-season mode. The only exception I see is if a rivalry develops, a la Dynamo-Pachuca or Dynamo-Monterrey, where the game will have a serious edge.

    In contrast, while an AS game is a little hokey, I think it automatically has a one-off, best-players cachet about it. And though it may be a revenue generator, an AS game is not AS reducible to a cash nexus.

    In terms of the precise format, I think the invitational approach provides more of a necessary measuring stick than conference v. conference or some other internal game. I also think it stokes more interest from fans and non-fans alike than just MLS v. MLS, which is inside baseball. And I also think that inasmuch as we don’t quite enforce the conferences for the playoffs, it’d be wierd to suddenly start doing so for AS. Last, to the extent this all moves towards single table — not the biggest fan but there seem to be plenty of loud advocates for single table and September-May scheduling — the us vs. them concept could be maintained just the same with 4 divisions, 2 conferences, or a single table. Us vs. Us relies on a certain amount of table stability, hence the move to US v. Int’l in the 3 division years.

    I also think if we ever do move to an aligned calendar — take it or leave it, I’m Swiss on the issue — you could in theory send a MLS AS abroad on tour like the Galaxy. Baseball does it…..

    Reply
  24. I would vote for no all star game. Chuck it. And make the U.S. Open Cup more important. Foreign clubs are already coming for friendlies — just work for more of that. And make the Open Cup the big domestic tournament that everyone should watch. That and the MLS Cup of course.

    Reply
  25. well for me I’m with Felix to get rid the all-star game but since already been said is going to go on for 10yrs more I like the format of USNMT vs. MLS all start, East vs. West or American MLS player against Foreigner.

    Reply
  26. East vs. West forever! Our all-stars SHOULD beat any foreign club, and USA vs. International is just plain dumb because the league has restrictions on foreigners.

    I yearn for the glory days of East vs. West, the only time I’d ever have a positive thought about a player from DC SCUM.

    Reply
  27. With MLS Cup at a neutral location, there needs to be an event for everyone [MLS execs to SGs] to hobnob at some point during the semester.

    Reply
  28. Ideally, West Vs. East with homefield advantage in the MLS Cup on the line…like baseball.

    2 squads full of stars probably wont happen for another 5 years, so until then, MLS vs. Foreign Club or MLS vs. Foreign All-Star team from a different league…eg., Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, France, Germany. Playing against another all-star team would make a more competitive game. Seasoned, championship squads always have the advantage over a newly assembled team with little practice.

    Reply
  29. I’d just get rid of the all-star game. I know there are revenue considerations, and that it won’t happen – I find it a forced copy of other American pro sports.

    I’m not a big fan of it, I can give a rat’s behind about who gets voted as an MLS all-star and how they look against Man Utd or anyone else when they have two practices together before the game. Let clubs fill up the date with friendlies against Euro/Mexican/South American clubs – and let’s get rid of this ridiculous exhibition game.

    Just my two cents.

    Reply
  30. MLS AS vs FMF Primera AS would be great. No way Mexican clubs would release their players for it though.

    I’d be very happy to try something other than a mid table Prem team. Bundesliga team perhaps? PPL not a big venue so this would be the time to change things up a bit.

    Reply
  31. I saw a comment for MLS All-Stars vs Mexican All Stars on another blog.

    It is a great idea for 3 reasons.

    One, MLS is trying to bring the Mexican-Americans into watching MLS, I don’t know any numbers, but it doesn’t seem to be working in droves anyway.

    Two, Mexico-US in soccer is the best rivalry in sports.

    Three, It just makes for a great story line, much better for real soccer fans than bringing in the teams they have been bringing in for the casual fans. ( my biased opinion there )

    Reply
  32. Um… None?

    Yeah, I know. Gotta shake that moneymaker. Not into the “us vs them” vibe of US v foreign. So keep the visiting club theme. It’s about making money, so make it.

    Reply
  33. D. None of the above. All the friendlies individual teams play against international clubs fill this gap; the All Star Game is just fixture congestion at this point.

    Reply

Leave a Comment