Top Stories

Euro 2012 Quarterfinal: England vs. Italy (Match Day Commentary)

 ItalyLogo  EnglandLogo

The must highly-anticipated match of the Euro 2012 quarterfinals is here, as England and Italy square off in a match that should be the most exciting of the round (2:45pm, ESPN).

England comes in having finished in first place in Group D, rattling off a 2-0-1 record in the group. They take on an Italy side that also managed a similar 2-0-1 unbeaten record in its group. One one side you have Wayne Rooney, Steven Gerrard and Joe Hart. On the other side you have the volatile Mario Balotelli, the legendary Gianluigi Buffon and the incomparable Andrea Pirlo.

The star-studded affair could come down to how England deals with Pirlo, and how England deal with Balotelli. The match-up features the strongest set of goalkeepers to face off in this tournament, and a potential penalty shootout would be hard to handicap.

SBI will be providing live commentary of today's match so please feel free to follow along here. As always, you are welcome to share your thoughts and opinions in the comments section below.

Enjoy the action (Today's commentary is after the jump):

 

Comments

  1. I spoke in terms of technical skill, not the scoreboard. A team can overcome the lack of technical skill (and get results). England and France split the points, but one had to be delusional not to see technical superiority of the French. Having less than 40 percent of possession against the likes of Sweden and Ukraine, struggling to put together more than 3 passes and being outshot by a wide margin, says it all about the technical skill of this team. England huffed and puffed, played hopeful long-balls, tried to grind out results, but there was very little technical skill they showed.

    Reply
  2. Come on. Second weakest team in the tournament? Then it was quite a feat for them to win their group and only be eliminated in the quarterfinals on penalties.

    Look, I’m not defending England – they aren’t very good. My only point is that Italy aren’t much better. And to say that England was the second weakest team in the tournament is frankly laughable.

    Reply
  3. Italy actually showed some quality at the group stage, while the quality of England’s play was abysmal throughout the whole tournament. They parked the bus in every single game, and got results at the group stage, but technically, they were probably the second weakest team in the tournament (just slightly better than Ireland). They were hanging by the thinnest of the threads in every game they played (being outshot and outpossessed by all four of their opponents), and eventually, their luck ran out.

    Reply
  4. These are my two least-favorite sides (well, along with Mexico), so trust me, I’m not an England fanboy. Italy dominated possession, but most of it was their defense kicking it around in the middle third. They created very few good chances, only a handful more than England did. Neither side were very impressive, especially after halftime, and neither belong with Germany, Spain, or Portugal in the semis, IMO.

    Reply
  5. I think most would disagree with the marginally better bit. And if Italy doesn’t belong who does? (I don’t even like Italy)

    Reply
  6. Italy deserved the win. You could hear Darke and Macca mustering up a little hope when it was getting late into the game and Italy couldn’t convert their many full and half-chances. Seemed as if they were praying for pks.

    Reply
  7. I would say the same about Italy, though. They were only marginally better all night (save the first fifteen minutes, where England looked dangerous), and had to go to penalties to get past a truly mediocre England side. Italy deserved to win, but neither belong in the semis.

    Reply
  8. The English are beyond stupid. Don’t they know how badly they suck at penalty kicks? For a country that talks so highly about their history they seem to have a short memory.

    Reply
  9. Well deserved Italian win.

    England did not deserve to sniff the next round after that embarrassment of a performance.

    Reply
  10. Let me sum up English football as evidenced by this team.

    1. Hack the hell out of everyone.
    2. Hit the ball long whenever you can.
    3. Dive at every chance to earn set pieces.
    4. Put 10 men behind the ball.

    Reply
  11. Seriously, get a non-English group of commentators for the England game. They think England walks on water and every foul shouldn’t be a foul.

    Reply
  12. Exactly. At one point he said that Italy’s passing had been “on another level” or some such and I about plotzed. The Italian strikers have had good first touches all game, being able to bring down some rather hopeful balls over the top. But that doesn’t make the passes good. If the Italians had been passing well they would have been able to take advantage of their domination of possession. The fact that they haven’t created many clear chances despite all of their possession shows that their passing has been off.

    Reply
  13. I agree with you. A lot of Italy’s chances have been lobbed balls over the top, where the Striker needs to take it down well, the defense has a chance to close in, the goalkeeper has a chance to take a better angle to block the goal, and the striker needs to take a very good shot to score.

    Reply
  14. I really have to disagree with Darke’s assessment of the game. Italy have generally been the better team, but he’s really blowing it out of proportion. This is miles away from the Spain-France game. Italy are dominating possession, but not creating very many good chances. Maybe it’s his inherent English cynicism kicking in.

    Reply
  15. England started very well, had the run of play for the first fifteen or so minutes. Italy got back in the game and were the better side for the rest of the half. Both sides have had their chances, and it’s been a surprisingly absorbing game. Certainly the best quarterfinal, I’d say.

    Reply
  16. Just been watching for 10 minutes or do and it appears England is dropping off when Italy builds up through midfield. Would think you would not want to give Italy’s attacking mids space to spray passes around.

    How have the 2 sides looked?

    Reply
  17. My feelings exactly. I’m a big fan of Darke, and while Macca can be a bit annoying at times, I think they make a great pair. But I only ever hear people knocking them around here.

    Reply
  18. Not the only one. Was a fan of Ian Darke, and I think he and McManaman have a good rapport together. I think he, like most color analysts, could do a lot more about giving insight on the game, but I think that about most soccer analysts on games.

    Reply
  19. I think a 3 man backline would’ve worked better for Italy against England. De Rossi would’ve helped distribute from the back so Rooney couldn’t crowd Pirlo as much, and it would take away the diagonals Welbeck or Rooney are looking for.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Michael Stypulkoski Cancel reply