Top Stories

USA vs. Russia: Match Day Commentary

 

The U.S. Men’s National Team will play their final match of the year this morning in the city of Krasnodar as they take on the Russian National Team (10am, ESPN2).

Jurgen Klinsmann has called in a team that is a good mix of regular starters and new young faces to take on a dangerous Russia side that has enjoyed a strong run of form in World Cup Qualifying.

Here is the USMNT lineup for today’s match:

Howard; Chandler, Cameron, Bocanegra (c), F. Johnson; Williams, Jones, Bradley, Gatt; Gomez, Altidore

Yes, that is Josh Gatt preparing to make his U.S. Men’s National Team debut today as a starter.

SBI will be providing live commentary on today’s match so please feel free to follow along with the action here. As always, you are welcome to send us questions, as well as share your own thoughts and opinions in the comments section below.

Enjoy the action (Commentary is after the jump):

Comments

  1. What is Juergen waiting to change? We’ve no ideas in the midfield. Get Diskerud out there. Give him a CHANCE. I’m not calling him a savior. If he doesn’t do well, that’s okay. It’s a friendly. But at least TRY shit.

    Agudelo up off the bench… We need to change our central midfield, not swap a forward. This is ridiculous…

    Reply
  2. We need someone to actually orchestrate the attack. It’s not Jones, and it’s not Bradley. They’re great players individually but we can’t have them on the field at the same time, specially with a defensive midfielder behind them. Bring Diskerud on for Jones, place him directly behind the forwards, then bring Kljestan for Gomez and have him drift into the space between lines. Don’t talk about proactive soccer and then play three box-to-box/defensive midfielders. This is simple stuff. No. Bradley and Jones aren’t pure defensive midfielders, but they’re not attacking midfielders. They’re good at both. That’s not enough. Get a freaking specialist out there and attack.

    Reply
  3. We are definitely starting to mesh better and play with confidence. Other than the miscommunication on the goal this isn’t half bad for a collection of players that haven’t played together.

    Reply
  4. I totally understand that we are playing a very strong Russian side. I would be fine if they were winning simply because they’re the better team. What drives me nuts is that we’re losing NOT because Russia is necessarily outplaying us but due to the fact of just silly, silly mistakes that just shouldn’t happen. BAD passes in our own half (to say the least!) and just simple things like not playing the ball to feet, trying to dribble around 3 guys, trying to thread the needle, etc. That’s what drives me nuts.

    Reply
  5. If you read the match commentary it makes it seem like we’re getting killed out there. We’re pretty much even aside from the blunder to be frank. We’re not being dominated or outplayed by any stretch so far.

    Reply
    • Yeah, all doom and gloom commentary. We’ve gone toe to toe outside of that miscommunication. Possession was nearly even and we’ve got up field a few times in good positions.

      Reply
    • I don’t think this is a case of being dominated or outplayed. I think this is a case of shooting ourselves in the foot and causing our own problems. Obviously Im referencing the goal, but also about all the easy balls we’ve given up on passes and in possession. All the needless fouling their players when their player is going nowhere. All the times we didn’t challenge for a 50-50

      That was the first 30 mins anyway. The last 15 we started rectifying those mistakes and looked muuuuuuch better out there.

      Reply
    • What do you expect? All this build up for this game and not once did I see a time posted over the past 4 days for the match.. Sure it’s on ESPN. wtf?

      Reply
  6. JK … yet another poor selection. I think it’s clear to everyone that Williams, Jones and Bradley can not all be on the pitch at the same time.

    Reply
  7. We don’t look as bad as the commentary makes it seems. Russia isn’t getting many chances either. It’s just a typical away USA game. Compact in the back with brief offensive bursts. In fact we’ve been having more of the ball in the past 20 miuntes or so.

    Reply
  8. Everyone needs to calm the heck down.

    This is Russia. They’re undefeated through qualifying, have not allowed a goal, just beat Portugal pretty soundly. They’ve beaten the Czech Republican 4-1 and Italy 3-0 this year.

    They are near being one of the top 5 hottest teams on the planet and we’re holding our own right now starting 3 players that haven’t suited up in a dozen matches.

    Reply
    • They’re not starting several of their top guys either and its ok to talk about the USA in respect to itself regardless of its opponent. I don’t hear anyone saying anything that warrants a “calm the heck down” statement. Everything said so far has been pretty reasonable and well said.

      Reply
  9. If the game continues to go this way and then we have to hear from everyone how horrible Jozy was I’ll lose it. He hasn’t seen one iota of service and how’s that his responsibility? I swear he just needs a bit more service than what he’s getting with USA.

    Reply
  10. pleased to see how the US is sticking to the idea of playing the ball through pressure. passes are a little off, yes, but if they stick to this they might be OK.

    Reply
  11. Doesn’t appear to be William’s blunder on replay. Jozy inexplicably runs through as he’s taking the kick and he hits Jozy and then the ball.

    Wtf was Jozy doing.

    Reply
    • …Why is this the only person saying this on here?? Its the truth and no one has said it. Should Danny have looked behind himself when he kicked? Maybe. But its still a crazy coincidence for that to happen, so I’m not even all that mad.

      Reply
  12. Ives, you nailed the lineup! Looking forward to big showings out of Jozy, Gatt and Chandler! Hopefully we see Swagudelo, Mixx, and TBoyd make cameos in the 2nd half also..

    C’mon Yanks!!

    Reply
  13. Ives is right that Bradley isn’t a defensive midfielder, but I think the main argument is that he and Jones probably aren’t really enough to break down a defense. Bradley is a great balanced presence that should be next to a more creative, shifty midfielder, and in front of an anchor.

    Bradley and Jones do have great ball skill for players with such good defensive ability though, and that can make us a great counter attacking team, but last time I checked, that’s not what Juergen was going for.

    Reply
  14. A little disappointed with the lineup. To me, it would have made more sense to stick to a 4-2-3-1 like what worked well against Guatemala instead of using a 4-3-3 similar to what had it’s issues against A&B. I would have loved to have seen Diskerud given a chance, even if it were in a 4-3-3. Instead, we get Jones next to Bradley in front of Williams. Pretty stale in my mind, but we’ll see. I said this before the Scotland game and we let loose then.

    I suppose it’s probably better to try something new off the bench than from the start. It’s just a tad frustrating.

    Reply
  15. Arrrgh! Full staff meeting in 20 minutes!

    Sigh…I guess I’ll just have to read about all the excitement in the post match analysis.

    >:’-( angry,sad,pouty face.

    Reply
  16. I’m hereby shuting dowing my internet so I can watch the game after work without prehand knowledge of the result. Let’s go USA!

    Reply
  17. Well, given this lineup and this coach and the quality of the opposition, I’m afraid we’re in for a disaster. On the other hand, our recent history of away friendlies against good opponents (Italy, Mexico) seems to indicate otherwise. So, I have no clue.

    Reply
      • It wouldn’t have been a disaster to try out something new, get our asses handed to us, and have a better idea of what doesn’t work rather than trying the same thing that had it’s struggles during qualifying.

  18. I definitely hope to see Gatt and Chandler combining to make some good runs down the right side, but also expect Gatt and Gomez to switch up some. Could be interesting.

    Reply

Leave a Comment