Top Stories

Your Questions Answered (Part 5 of 5)

Stewartmcbride_isiphotoscom

                                                                      Photo by ISIphotos.com

Good morning and welcome to the latest installment of Your Questions Answered. It took a long time, but I finally finished off the last Q&A session, from October, and have those remaining answers for you today.

There were some good topics to discuss, such as ranking the Top 10 American goalkeepers, as well as my All-Time Best XI for currently retired U.S. national team players.

Now that these have finally been completed, look out for another Q&A this week. probably on Thursday. I will need to cut down on the number of questions I take because the numbers of questions are keeping me from answer them all in a timely manner.

Now, on to the answers to the rest of your most recent questions:

——————————-

ART– Being a soccer history buff here, which starting eleven retired USA national team players (can still be playing club soccer) would you say would make the best eleven? Kind of an all star team choosing….

IVES– Here’s my best XI of RETIRED U.S. national team players based on form in their primes.

—————Brian McBride————-Eric Wynalda——————

Earnie Stewart————–Clint Mathis———————Tab Ramos

———————-John Harkes—-Claudio Reyna———————–

——-Alexi–Lalas———Marcelo-Balboa—————Eddie Pope—

———————————-Brad Friedel———————————

I reserve the right to make changes to this squad since I’m sure I’m probably forgetting somebody. It should be noted that I had John O’Brien listed but Mathis over him (Mathis circa 2000-2001 was a truly special player). I could have put Mathis at forward in favor of Wynalda but there’s no denying Wynalda’s national team contributions.

——————————-

JONATHAN G– Hi Ives, What do you think so far of season 4 of Prison Break?

IVES– I think it has been entertaining, though a bit darker than the past seasons. I’m not going to say the show has jumped the shark yet but it’s getting pretty close. I will say that Michael Rappaport as a federal agent is one of the least believable castings I’ve seen on TV in a long time.

——————————-

MICHAEL F– If Donavan goes to Bayern Munich, will he start? If he doesn’t start, will he quit again citing missing his girlfriend and dogs? If he doesn’t go to Munich, have you heard of any other teams showing an interest and if so who? Finally, who is better? Lando of Deuce?

IVES– I see you’re a Landon Donovan fan. I think Donovan will get playing time if he signs and I think he’s talented and mature enough now to succeed in a way he never came close to in his stints with Bayer Leverkusen. I haven’t heard of any names of other teams showing interest, but have heard that there are clubs who have inquired. As for Donovan and Dempsey, they’re different kind of players with different strengths. That’s a hard call. I think if you’re talking who I’d rather sign to a team, I’d probably say Donovan. If you’re talking who I’d rather have in a one-off situation, in a big game with a lot on the line? I’ll take Dempsey.

——————————-

CHRIS– 1. Will GBS and Schmid re-sign in Columbus? 2. Will MLS continue to rely mostly on college soccer for players or will academies take over?

IVES– 1. I don’t know enough about Schelotto’s situation but I wonder if winning MLS Cup will impact his decision. An MLS Cup win might lead him to retire on that note, or then go to Argentina to play for Gimnasia. As for Schmid, I would put money on him accepting a big contract offer from Seattle Sounders FC. Schmid has done the job in Columbus and I could see him tempted by a new challenge and by the power of the Seattle ownership, which has big bucks and a new market to win over. If that happens Crew fans shouldn’t be too worried. Schmid has built a great young team and assistant coach Robert Warzycha is one of the best head coaching prospects in MLS.

——————————-

MIKE K– Yes or nooooo!!!!!!! 1. Reading’s looking hot as it is right now… 1a. Do they stay on the elevator and go back up? 1b. Will Convey EVER play? 2. Germany’s looking as weak as ever… Will they get a team past the CL group stages in this year or next year’s tournament? 3. UEFA cup’s getting it’s name changed? Sounds like a ploy. Will it work in it’s attempt to grant meaning on the tournament? non-yes/no… Keane’s contract looks to be getting extended at Sunderland… You’re take on his management job, and his um, run ins with well… Just about everyone?

IVES– Mike, you’re pushing the question limit my friend, but here goes: 1A. I don’t think Reading goes back up. 1B. Convey will play again, but will get hurt again and will be playing in MLS in 2009.

2. Have you seen Bayern? I’m convinced they’re good enough to get to the Champions League quarterfinals depending on the draw.

3. No, a name won’t do that, but having prestigious teams in the tournament and having great games will do that. AC Milan being in it this year should make things very interesting. I also think UEFA Cup is more prestigious than American fans may realize. I think Keane is a very good manager who is going to have a great career. As for his run-ins, I think he’s still a very strong-willed individual but someone who is slowly learning how to be a more diplomatic person. Nobody has a problem with Alex Ferguson’s constant run-ins with people, nor do I think it effects his ability to be a good manager.

——————————-

SUPSAM– Do you think Shunsuke Nakamura would be an ideal DP for seattle (which also has a huge japanese population)? If so, what are MLS’s chances of getting him?

IVES– Supsam, I’ve been tooting the Nakamura to Seattle horn since day one so yes, I think he would have been ideal. I just don’t think he’s interested, which is probably why Seattle settled on Freddie Ljungberg. There are other Japanese players who are more available, like a Shinji Ono, but Nakamura would be the holy grail of DP’s for Seattle.

——————————-

YOSSARIAN– Oh wise Obi-Wan, You’ve sounded very down on Freddie Adu of late. I, too, have noticed that his defense is erratic at best on the few occasions I’ve been able to see him of late (Olympics, qualifying and several USMNT matches), though I disagree with you regarding his offensive contributions.

My question is this. Should we begin worrying about Freddie and his seeming lack of commitment on the defensive end, or is this pretty normal for a kid his age who is an offensive player? Can we expect him to develop his defense as he gets older, or is this a serious flaw in his game that may hinder him for years from getting playing time at a high level? I’ve noticed that he seems to back way off of players with the ball and just sit in passing lanes, hoping for help/ to cherry pick a bad pass. Is this simply a motivational problem with aggressiveness or does he lack the tools/ skills/ strength to take on offensive players? I think this is so important because he IS a wonderful offensive player who will get much more playing time if BB and his club coach sees that he can be played not just as a striker but also as a midfielder who can get back and help out on defense.

IVES– I guess you can say I’m down on Adu because he just hasn’t shown the progress you would have hoped for at this point. I know he’s still only 19, but every year for a while we’ve gotten the same refrain. “He’s only 18, he’ll develop.” “He’s only 17, he’ll develop.” “He’s only 18, he’ll develop.” The on-the-ball skill is there, but he’s not exactly strong on the ball, has what must be described as a poor work rate, and can be neutralized pretty easily.

Here’s the thing. You can put him on the field and he can contribute offensively, but you almost need to build your team around him and have an extra defensive midfielder to make up for what he lacks and there’s a serious question of whether he’s someone a team would ever do that for. The modern game doesn’t allow for those one-way playmakers who don’t contribute on both ends (at least not in Europe or on the international level). The speed of play, strength and intensity of the modern game make it difficult to carry that type of player, especially on the international level. There are some rare exceptions, like a Juan Riquelme, but I don’t think anybody is equating Adu to Riquelme.

Unless and until Adu develops a better work rate and a more intense approach to being a two-way player he will struggle to find a role both in Europe and the U.S. national team. I’m not ready to say he’s washed up though, that would be crazy to say about a player his age. He obviously has talent, and has shown that this past year, but anyone who thinks he hasn’t flourished because he hasn’t been given chances is living in denial.

——————————-

ALTICOOPER– Who do u feel the top ten American goal keepers are at the moment (pretending they are all at full health)? Also, Its obvious Howard is our number one while Guzan is our number

2… who do you think would be our number 3 and alternative for the world cup. I don’t see Friedel in the mix unless Howard is injured. Hesmer, Keller, Cervi (if things go well with celtic) Hahnemann, Perkins, are all names that come to mind

IVES– Here are my Top 10:

  • 1. Tim Howard
  • 2. Brad Friedel
  • 3. Marcus Hahnemann
  • 4. Brad Guzan
  • 5. Kasey Keller
  • 6. Joe Cannon
  • 7. Matt Reis
  • 8. Troy Perkins
  • 9. Kevin Hartman
  • T10. Will Hesmer
  • T10. Jon Busch

(I forgot about Matt Reis in my original list, he should be there.)

It’s tough to know at what level Kasey Keller will be playing at in 2009, after having not played for a year, but if he’s anywhere close to his level at Fulham last spring then I think he’ll be a Top five player.

Some folks will question Joe Cannon as the first MLS keeper on the list but he’s the best in the league for my money. From seven to 10 is really tough to call and I wouldn’t really argue with any order for that group.

I also think that once Matt Pickens has a team and is playing again he will be on this list. Then there are those second-tier European keepers like David Yelldell and Luis Robles, who haven’t seen enough of to compare, but starting in Bundesliga II isn’t something to sneeze at.

Dom Cervi is way too raw to put on this list, Celtic or not, but he’s someone who COULD potentially be a Top five goalkeeper in three or four years.

——————————-

ROB– Do you think in the next 4-5 years soccer will be a popular sport? Will MLS stadiums be full?

IVES– I think soccer can increase its popularity, but I think MLS and U.S. Soccer have to do a better job of marketing the sport. It’s headed in the right direction, but people expecting soccer to match the Big Three sports in the near future isn’t living in reality. Football, baseball and basketball have decades and decades of established followings and deep roots in this country’s sports culture. The goal should be to see soccer move past the likes of hockey, auto racing, golf and tennis. The higher up it moves, the more exposure it will receive and the more casual fans can be won over.

——————————-

MARK– Thanks for doing this website. It’s a really big asset to MLS fans. What are the rules for Seattle’s expansion draft going to look like? Are they likely to sign anymore players before the draft and if so who?

IVES– Hey Mark, thanks for writing in and for the kind words. Here are the MLS expansion draft rules. As for signings, Seattle Sounders FC have signed Kasey Keller, Sebastian LeToux, Freddie Ljungberg and Sanna Nyassi.

——————————-

BLUEWHITELION– What affect do you think free movies ("with limited commercial interruption!) on IMDb and Hulu.com will have on online rental companies like Netflix and Blockbuster? With the current single entity structure, do you think a highly successful Montreal team/fans/Toronto rivalry, could provide better financial MLS stability, even if it is not a US market, nor the largest market?

IVES– Blockbuster has been doomed for a long time. Netflix will need to find a new strategy. The phrase “evolve or die” is painfully true in the biz of movie rentals. Having Montreal in the league and having that rivalry can only help the league. Healthy and successful franchises that turn profits and develop strong and growing fan bases are the key to MLS flourishing and Montreal could certainly provide that, which is why I think we’ll see Montreal be chosen for 2011.

——————————-

BUBBLEHOUSE– 1. Seeing that michael bradley scores most of his goals from follow ups. Wouldn’t it benefit him as well as the rest of Team USA to start a striker who can at least put shots on goal. I don’t mind brian ching but he just can’t unleash a shot like kenny cooper. I believe just having a player that could get shots and maybe cause some spilled balls would increase the US offensive output 10 fold. Disagree? 2. With the success of USL in champions league should MLS Bids be lowered to 2 or 3 and at least one US based USL team be given a berth. Or perhaps and automatic berth to their champion?

IVES– I disagree with your presentation, but the root of what you’re trying to say is true enough. It would benefit the national team to have a striker good enough to put strong shots on goal because it helps any team to have a dangerous striker (I also think it’s a myth that Bradley’s goals are mainly tapped in rebounds. A lot of his goals come off secondary runs and players finding him on those runs).

I can understand why you think Cooper “unleashing” shots could be a way for the national team to improve it’s offense but I would say that a majority of those clear chances Cooper has gotten on the club level with FC Dallas wouldn’t come on the international level. That’s not a knock on Cooper, but the reality of the higher level of play on the national team level, and the mediocre defending in MLS.

2. No. That’s not happening. Nor do I think it should.

——————————-

TDM– Will the USA ever produce a soccer player on par with Messi or Ronaldo or Zidane? If so, when and from what part of the country do you see this player emerging?

IVES– Ever? That’s impossible to say but it should be noted that there are plenty of countries that have never produced a Messi or Ronaldo. I do think the chances of developing that kind of player increase as MLS grows and invests more in player development, as U.S. continues to grow and improve its Player Development Academy initative, and as soccer slowly becomes a popular sport in all regions of this country. As for what part of the country, that’s a bit insane to try and predict, but if I had to put some money on where, I think I’d have to go with New Jersey/New York. Yes, I’m a homer, but considering Jersey helped produce John Harkes, Claudio Reyna, Tab Ramos and Giuseppe Rossi I don’t think it’s a stretch.

——————————-

SEAN– Ives, you rule. Two questions.

1. It’s become increasingly evident to me that Garber is not taking the league as far as he used to be able to. How much longer will we keep Don Garber in the Commissioner’s role?

2. Let’s face it. MLS teams won’t get any better if they just keep playing the same old, same old style against the same 13 clubs. The play in the Champion’s League has been much better than MLS. Non-MLS clubs are much more creative and technically gifted on the ball, whereas MLS clubs just do the same old attack almost every time. MLS clubs are predictable. Should fans sit back and just accept the fact that the league and its clubs aren’t taking things like the Champion’s League seriously? Not to mention that it makes it awfully hard to defend MLS against soccer snobs when out champion clubs can’t even beat the champs from T&T or Honduras, while USL1 clubs can. We almost always get schooled by clubs from other countries in serious competitions.

IVES– Thanks Sean.

1. What exactly isn’t Garber doing? The league is growing, money is coming in from better television contracts, the league’s marketing arm has become a very successful endeavor. If you’re talking about the on-field product and the quality of talent and play, I would argue that those things don’t fall under Garber’s responsibilities. I would agree that it is a legitimate question of whether the league’s player personnel department is equipped and capable of handling the responsibilities of making this league grow. Especially when the MLS player personnel department has more influence and control of player moves than even teams do.

2. Sean, what exactly is the “MLS style of play”? There isn’t just one style of play in MLS. Various teams play various styles, some better than others, some more stylish than others, and yes, some more boring and predictable than others, but to lump the entire league into one group is a bit much. As for the Champions League, the inconvenient truth about MLS and Champions League is that MLS teams just don’t have the depth to put forth strong efforts in both league play and Champions League, and since winning in MLS is still the priority, MLS teams are being forced to field teams with developmental players and end of bench types rather than all their stars.

As for your “Champions League play is better than MLS” suggestion, I will agree that there has certainly be plenty more offense in Champions League play than MLS play but you’re also basing that on the games you saw on TV (which were usually the best games of the rounds). If you only get to see the best match-ups you’re obviously going to find the quality of play better than that of MLS as a whole.

And I don’t think you can take this year’s Champions League and use it as a unilateral piece of evidence to convict the quality of play in MLS. Consider the four teams that played in the tournament. Houston was good and had the best showing, but D.C. had major injury issues all year, New England was also seriously short-handed in the tournament and then you had Chivas USA, which was in bad shape injury-wise when it put itself into a hole in the tournament. At the end of the day, MLS teams need to be deeper to have any hope of having serious success in tournaments like the CONCACAF Champions League.

Comments

  1. Unless a street soccer culture evolves, we may never produce a world class player. We probably have more kids playing soccer then any country in the World, but most only practice twice a week when mom drives them to practice. The world class players grow up playing nearly everyday.

    Also, they learn to play with more creativity when there isn’t a coach yelling at them telling them what to do every second.

    Reply
  2. Raghu – look, I’m not saying Reyna was solely to blame for ’98. There are obviously lots of people on whome to place the blame, starting with Sampson. But as to the players who played on the ’98 team, Reyna was supposed to be our best player – as mentioned, he was in the prime of his career playing for the National Team and in the Bundesliga and already had World Cup experience. And Reyna simply didn’t play like our best player. Reyna also wasn’t our best player in 2002, even though he was the captain, etc. – I always thought his Best XI award in 2002 was undeserving. Heck, in 2002, Reyna wasn’t even our best *central midfielder*, JOB was. (Reyna played well for the tournament overall, but remember wasn’t even on the field in the Portugal game.) Maybe it’s just that my expectations for Reyna were too high, I don’t know, but I feel like Reyna disappointed alot on the big stage.

    Reply
  3. AS – its crazy to blame Reyna for 98 – and to say that he didn’t have a solid world cup in Korea.

    If you remember, Sampson changed formation from qualifying to the cup and played that 4-5-1 which we weren’t good enough to run. Reyna was the holding mid. What the hell did you want him to do?

    Reply
  4. Adu actually lacks the workrate of a top level forward, but it’s even more pronounced as a midfielder.

    Messi is considered a forward/midfielder — similar size and speed. Yet he is a tireless worker who gives a ton of effort almost every chance he gets. Look at some other top level forwards: Henry, Drogba, Eto – all of these guys work hard for their chances.

    I know that people like to bash on workrate/effort because many US coaches overlook skill for effort. The fact of the matter though is that the top players in the world have great desire/workrate on the field combined with great skill/talent/creativity.

    The USNT suffers from too many specialists on the field. Players who are allowed to only attack or only defend for the most part. We need to play as a single team on both defending and attacking. Only then can the NT step up to the next level.

    Reply
  5. Ives,

    I think your last answer said exactly what the question asked. Is Garber doing what he should now. Lack of depth comes from the lack of money and the small roster. Is the MLS hording money or are they just scared to allow spending. It has to be within reason, however some teams are filling their stadiums and if they want to spend the money, then let them. The clubs that can’t afford will not. This is no different from any other league. A salary cap is ok, but raise it to a reasonable level. This isn’t 2001. It is 2008 and a different league.

    Reply
  6. HEY!

    Cepero is WAAAAAAyyyyyy better than hesmer, perkins, or busch!!!

    and i agree with you on prison break. it’s better than s3, but not close to the brilliance of s1 or the suspense level of s2.

    Reply
  7. Beckster,

    No, it’s not based on today’s posting. My reaction is cumulative, after having regularly read his columns for the last few years.

    I’m just disgusted by how all those who post are so deferential to him because he’s English, or went to the freakin’ London School of Economics.

    He does make good points every so often, but he’s full of serious excrement just as frequently. He also can’t, or won’t deign to consider an opinion or viewpoint that is not his own.

    Reply
  8. Voodoo…is this a reaction to today’s blog and the comment the the Red Bulls are argueably the worst team ever to make the finals? Because I thought his comments on the MLS match were quite insightful!

    Reply
  9. I’ve been playing FM2009 the past 2 days and I want to know why Ljunberg is on the Sounders but Keller is not???????????????

    I’d put Cobi Jones and Stewart as subs on that Best XI to make it a best XIII. or is it Best XIIV???????????

    Reply
  10. Tony in Quakeland – I think the problem with the ’98 World Cup team was that it lacked a good midfield. Yes, there were a lot of quality players on the team – as Ives’s list showed. But the midfield never came together – Sampson was playing guys like Brain Maisoneauve and Chad Deering. Ramos was there, but was clearly over the hill by then – in fact, he only started one of the three games. However, the player I blame most for the ’98 debacle is Reyna. Reyna was in the prime of his career – only 25 years old or so, but with World Cup experience from ’94, and with experience playing at the highest club level in the Bundesliga. Reyna should have been the one to step up and lead the team in the midfield. He wasn’t able to. (In fact, I think Reyna has been VERY disappointing in the World Cup in general, which is why I wouldn’t put him in by Best XI retired players.)

    Reply
  11. Don’t like to make fun of our National Team, but when I first looked at that picture I thought it was going to be a “your Caption” thread. Maybe that’s where LandyCakes and Bri Bri came from………..

    Reply
  12. MikeK,

    See the question and Ives’ answer above for more info. I think it’s pretty clear. Ives went into pretty good detail about Freddie’s defensive shortcomings.

    re: the whole F vs Mid question, It doesn’t really matter where you list someone like Freddie because:

    1) Even forwards, in most systems, have to be able to backtrack and play defense.

    2) In order to get regular playing time in a major league, he’s going to have to be able to play anywhere on the attack. Do you think he’ll be more valuable to a team if he can play one position or 5? If he plays only one position, he can be blocked by a single player. He has to maximize his versatility because his height already restricts what you can do with him up front. Guys like Donovan, Dempsey, etc. are sometimes listed as forwards, but they can really play anywhere on the attack.

    Reply
  13. Gino, I like Sanneh, too. I think he was plagued by injury and inconsistency perhaps, but at the end of his Hertha and 02 playing days, I thought he was one of the best.

    I think Armas needs to be in there somewhere. Perhaps not at the end of his career, but he was a defensive midfield beast for a while, second to none.

    Reply
  14. Ives,

    In my experience reading his columns, Jen Chang is an inveterate douchebag.

    I know, I know, he’s ENGLISH and has that oggsbridge education that everyone is enamored of, so they all bow before him.

    Please! I’m not saying he isn’t intelligent– he can be fairly insightful– but he just doesn’t give anybody else’s perspective consideration. Seems like he takes anything outside of his own vaunted opinions as a personal insult.

    Is that your experience?

    Reply
  15. Tony in Q’land: totally felt the 98 squad under under UNDER achieved. There was the purported meltdown at the players quarters in France (I don’t blame Sampson for that, I blame the cry baby immature players), There was leaving off Harkes (I blame Sampson, even thougth Harkes may have contributed ego) and there was the playing scared against Germany (skill wise, US should have played MUCH better, could have beat them). etc. For me, much more upsetting than 06.

    Reply
  16. Yoss- What do you mean “two way?” I understand he’s used as a midfielder sometimes, but his natural place is up front. Fifa has him as a Center forward, and I agree with that assessment of his skills.

    Reply
  17. Thanks for imparting the wisdom, Ives. I carried on too much in my question and the point sort of got lost – the essence of my query is this: should we be worried that Adu’s commitment to 2-way play is so poor or is that pretty normal for a kid of his age, and how easy is that to correct if he gets his head on straight?

    Reply
  18. Retired XI – No Tony Sanneh? He played strongly and every minute in Korea/Japan 2002. He had the game winning assist against Portugal. Definately Sanneh over Lalas.

    Reply
  19. For the fans who don’t think Adu doesn’t live up to expectations, i’ll say I like Adu on the national team level as a back-up to Donovan. Look how brilliant he played against England, Spain and Argentina.

    Reply
  20. Ives, regarding both the Retired XI and the question of “could the US ever produce a player on the level of X” – there are those who say that Billy Gonsalves was the best the US ever produced, and comments from foreign coaches seemed to rate him very highly among contemporary players, not to mention their efforts to recruit him to their sides. Granted he didn’t play a lot of games for the US, but the Retired XI question simply asked who were the best.

    Where does Billy Gonsalves fit into our historical picture of American soccer players? Do we relegate him to the dustbin of (pre 1980s) soccer history because we don’t have film of him? And more importantly, how does the recent success of the US Nats affect the ways we memorialize past players like Gonsalves? Thanks.

    Reply
  21. Fact: Kevin Doyle is the best striker in the Championship. Reading did well to get him to stay, though I see him departing either this summer or next winter if Reading doesn’t look like going up. He’s got Eire on his mind, too, after all. The same goes for the elder Hunt.

    That said, I think Reading does go up this year. I think they’re playing much better than the team that couldn’t save itself at the end of last year. It’s going to be dicey, however. They really need to finish second and garentee it. Playoffs, as the most recent one we’re all enjoying here in America, are a crap shoot that they’d do well to avoid. I think the Wolves look great, and see them taking the crown, providing no dramatic slip ups.

    Reply
  22. Way to pay attention there, Jeff. It’s not like Ives didn’t cap the RETIRED part or anything… 🙂

    Good Q and A as usual Ives. I’m just glad we made it thru without a “you know who” reference.

    Reply
  23. Pete, DVR – Reading is fantastic and they have really filled in the holes that have been created by their 5 top players leaving. They seem to be able to bring in young talent – look how deep their midfield is. Convey is playing well but can’t dress – same with their center mids.

    The one caution is relative to who they will lose in January. It was pretty much a forgone conclusion that they would lose Doyle, Hunt, and maybe Harper and that would have made a difference. Doyle has signed a contract, however, and Everton is now pursuing a different left wing and Harps doesn’t seem to have as much buzz. So…looks like they may remain intact for the season – if they lose Hunt, I think Convey steps in nicely. I do think the loss of Bikey, however, would be a killer. When he was out injured last year, they bled goals. I really like this team!

    Reply
  24. Joseba Llorente is out for a month. He’s Villareal’s top scorer…could this mean more Josie?

    A.S., you’re crazy. Your replacements are worthy choices. In fact even though I remember Dooley more for his midfield role I agree he was also better when he was a defender than Lalas.

    But man…for that short window Mathis was so filthy. Better than Perez (again, for that sort window). And at his best Reyna may have been the second best American player of all time (behind Ramos…and even that’s arguable because of his injuries).

    Obviously this is all opinion and I don’t really think you’re crazy. But I think unless we are putting some kind of limit on this (number of caps, or something) Mathis and Reyna deserve to be in that list at their best.

    Reply
  25. A.S.

    I’ve always argued that the 98 team (or at least the pool) was more talented than the 02 squad. It’s a testament to how bad a job Sampson did that they finished last.

    Reply
  26. You think Reading are not going back up this season? Who goes up if its not Reading? You know three teams get promoted (one via a playoff). A majority of the teams that have played Reading this season have used them as a litmus test to see where they stand in the league. Remember, Fulham kept out Reading out of the EPL by goal difference only since they finished level on points. Here are a couple of reasons why Reading will be promoted this year:

    -They have the best player in the Championship in Kevin Doyle and the best defender in Andre Bikey

    -They have the best offense and the best defense in the Championship as of right now (check out the goal difference and their goals for and against, its pretty good)

    -Reading has the deepest roster of all the teams in (i.e. Leroy Lita going out on loan to Norwich, Alex Pearce being loaned out to Southampton, Simon Church who along with Aaron Ramsey ripped apart the England U-21 defense last month was loaned to Wycombe, Simon Cox being sold to Swindon who is being tracked by Fulham & Spurs, etc.).

    Reply
  27. “Here’s my best XI of RETIRED U.S. national team players…”

    Ladies and Gentlemen, your 1998 US World Cup Squad!

    (I know, I know, “in their primes”. Still, it’s a bit disturbing that 9 of the 11 on Ives’s team were on the 1998 World Cup squad that finished dead last.)

    Reply
  28. Great question on retiree best 11! Totally understand Balboa in the middle of the defense, but have a hard time not seeing Eddie Pope in the center of that defense!

    I think Balboa as an announcer has taken some of the lustre off.

    What about the bench:

    JOB, Dooley and Cobi come to mind. Who else?

    Reply
  29. Jeff, Ives, lol. I had the same initial reaction, skipping over “retired” but, unlike Jeff, I answered my question before I posted my incredulity! lol

    Ives–My memory of Tab Ramos is slim, and he seemed injured a lot . . . but my memory is that he may have been one of the best US players ever. Is that fair? Or was it those blasted Snickers commercials from 94 that made me think he was soooo good?

    Reply
  30. I like that XI Ives. Because of his attitude a lot of people forget that for a period of about two years Mathis was the best living American soccer player. I mean he was injured during the world cup in 2002 and minute-per-minute may have been the best player (excluding keepers) we had int hat tournament, though obviously that is a bit of a stretch given how Reyna played.

    Reply
  31. Ives I wasn’t necessarily putting down Bradley by saying a majority of his goals are tap ins. I think his excellent runs are what put him in position for such goals. I also didn’t mean to imply that cooper was the answer but as a whole team the US never seems to have many shots from distance. Is this a flaw with development of US players or are kids just discourage from shooting. Sorry about a new question. Great job as always

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Tony in Quakeland Cancel reply