Top Stories

Peter Wilt looking to revitalize soccer in Chicago with NASL project

Photo by Kamil Sparza
Photo by Kamil Szpara

Peter Wilt has already solidified his place as one of the more important figures in the history of Chicago soccer, but the longtime executive is now looking to revitalize and revolutionize the game in a city he calls home.

The former Chicago Fire president and general manager is one of the leading figures in an effort to bring an NASL club to the city of Chicago. Alongside longtime partner Jack Cummins and private equity and venture capital firm Club 9 Sports, Wilt’s goal is to have an NASL team up and running within the city by either 2017 or 2018.

That process began, in earnest, on Monday night. Wilt and his partners met with fans to announce the launch of the club’s official website while signaling the first public appearance of the club. According to Wilt, those in attendance made the atmosphere feel like a true club launch, even if there are plenty of loose ends to still tie up in the coming weeks.

Still, the announcement of a potential addition to the Chicago soccer landscape has already made an impact on a city that Wilt believes is yearning for a second team to compete with and raise the level of the Fire.

“It bothers me a bit, but I understand it at the same time, that people think we’re trying to steal fans from the Fire,” Wilt told SBI. “The market is so huge that there is room for two very successful teams. In Chicagoland, there are nine million people, four million of which care about soccer. Only 100,000 go to professional soccer games annually now, so that means there’s 3.9 million people that care about soccer that aren’t going to professional soccer games. A new team could be the outlet for many of those 3.9 million. It doesn’t have to be a single Fire fan going to a Chicago NASL game instead of a Fire game to make this successful.

“You’re already seeing Fire fans becoming more passionate about the love for their Fire because they see the Chicago NASL team, perhaps, as a threat. I don’t. I think it’s going to be a good thing, largely because of what I just described. It makes the Fire more relevant. It gets their fans engaged and that’s a good thing for everyone.”

For Wilt and company, the first challenge comes with securing a home within the city limits, a battle that the former Fire executive is all too familiar with.

Employed by the Fire from 1997-2005, Wilt was a key figure in the Fire’s move to Bridgeview, a move that many view as a hindrance to the team’s reputation within the city. In a location that is difficult to reach via public transit, the Fire have struggled in recent years as the team’s performance on the field has continued to wane ahead of a 2016 rebuild.

Coming from another start-up project in Indy Eleven, Wilt understands how important it is to properly handle the stadium situation with his new Chicago team. To start, the club has asked fans to participate in a survey with three possible temporary locations: the Chicago Bears’ Soldier Field, the Cubs’ Wrigley Field and the White Sox’s U.S. Cellular Field.

According to Wilt, the club is already in active discussions with representatives from Soldier Field, which would likely make the most sense given the summer schedules in the two baseball stadiums. However, the club is not prepared to close any doors on the other two options. Wilt says that the process could be “90 percent” done by the end of the week, and would serve as a major domino towards locking up other specifics with the clubs investors.

The goal remains to have a soccer-specific stadium within the city limits, something that proved to be a challenge for the Fire roughly a decade ago. As a key part in the move to Bridgeview, Wilt says Fire ownership at the time was not in a place to privately fund a stadium inside the city. Now, Wilt believes the NASL group can, paving the way for a potential game-changing home within Chicago’s city limits.

“Down the road, we recognize we need to be in a soccer-centric stadium,” Wilt said. “We’ve already been in preliminary discussions with the city about locations for a 20,000-seat soccer stadium. We’ll need to be in one of those other venues for likely at least three years.

“In this case, the Chicago NASL, our investors recognize that it will take a largely private commitment to build a stadium, and with that, if (former Fire owners) AEG had that same willingness 12 years ago, the Fire’s stadium would be in the city. It’s obviously easier to get a stadium built that is largely privately funded.”

All of those processes begin with the community, Wilt says. The current group has already made significant efforts to reach out to fans to help put a stamp on the team. Having gone through this process with Indy Eleven, Wilt says that the connection between fans and club was vital in making the club the most well-attended in NASL.

As Wilt sees it, ownership and management are “merely caretakers” for a club and culture that belong to the city and community. To engage that community, the Chicago NASL group is looking to set up a supporters’ trust due to new laws in Illinois. The first of its kind in the state, the plan could be in place by the end of March and would allow fans to own and invest in their new local team.

Another way to engage the fans is by giving them a say in its construction, something the team has done through online surveys. In addition to asking about stadium preferences, the club has asked for ideas of names and colors to represent the team.

The history of Chicago soccer has been earmarked as something important to the club, which knows its not starting in a vacuum. Because of that fact, the name of the Chicago Sting has already been floated around as a throwback to the NASL side that represented the city from 1974–1988.

According to Wilt, the NASL currently owns the federal trademark for the Sting name, while founder Lee Stern owns rights in the state of Illinois. The club is not closing any doors on the Sting name, but is also ready and eager to listen to different suggestions throughout the process.

“Taking the name of the Sting has not been determined officially one way or the other,” Wilt said. “One of the questions on the survey is for the fans to tell us what they want the name of the club to be. I think there’s a pretty large amount of support for the name of the Chicago Sting, especially from the people of my generation. I’m in my 50’s, and they have fond memories of the Sting when they won the championship in 1981, the first Chicago championship in any sport in 18 years.

“There’s going to be some push for that, but at the same time, there’s also a feeling that this is a club for a new generation and young adults and Chicagoans that want to have their own team. We’ll see how it all plays out, and it’s good to have that interest from people where they’re so passionate and they care about it.”

As for the team’s colors, the decision remains up in the air. The club thinks it may be a bit redundant to go with the Chicago flag like the NWSL’s Chicago Red Stars, but it may also be viewed as something that brings the city and its clubs together under one look.

Regardless of colors or names or venues, Wilt says the club is committed to putting together a first-division product that can challenge any team in North America. The group in charge of the club expect to invest in player salaries that can compete with any in the country while pushing the team into both local and national relevance.

To that aim, Wilt says conversations with those within the NASL have been positive. In addition, the reaction from those within Chicago has also yielded the desired result. The challenge now is to put it all into practice, as Wilt looks to bring yet another club to a city that still means so much to him.

“(The NASL) recognizes the importance of having a club in Chicago that can be successful,” Wilt said. “You don’t want to put a team there just to have a team in the third-largest market in the country, but you absolutely want to have a club there if it’s going to be successful. They have told me, to this point, that they have been pleased with the progress we’ve had and we’re very hopeful we can put it all together in the near future.

“It would mean a lot because I want the sport to be relevant again in Chicago,” Wilt added. “Chicago is one of the great soccer cities in the country and, unfortunately, over the last six years plus, it has become less relevant. I think this team can put professional soccer back on the radar of everyday Chicagoans like it was 15 years ago. Not just with Chicago NASL, but I think we can help the Chicago Fire become more relevant. I think what you saw in New York with the Cosmos and New York City came on board, the Red Bulls become more relevant. It would make me very proud to have a hand in doing that.”


  1. Great news for Chicago soccer fans that they will have an NASL club in the city. With Peter Wilt involved it ensures things will be done right. Hopefully they will end up using the Chicago Sting name, its a perfect fit.

    With NASL improving each year and their goal of co D1 status with single entity MLS in the next few years things look to be improving for fans getting their soccer fix in Chicago and North America. Chicago is big enough as well to support the MLS Fire Franchise in the suburbs and this NASL club in the city of Chicago. Exciting times for the sport and looking forward to the first NASL match in Chicago in 2017!

  2. Don’t forget the Peter Wilt was fired from the Fire for incompetent. The Cosmos relevant to New York..? what stupid comment.

  3. Waste of time. No one is coming to watch minor league games even if the stadium is in a convenient location. NASL should focus on markets without a professional team. We see what happens when they don’t – the so called “global brand” Hempstead Cosmos can only draw 4k up against two MLS teams in the same market.

    • I just don’t understand their recent strategy. Miami, Oklahoma City (where the competition is also lower-league), and now Chicago. Whether or not they’re trying to steal fans from other teams is almost irrelevant when you consider that they are certainly stealing potential fans. And when you look at all the major markets with no one supporting them, it’s a wonder that they think this is necessary/feasible, let alone their best option. I know I’m very disappointed with what they’re doing.

    • Not for nothing, but the amount of clubs within MLS that play outside the city limits they’re labeled as renders that attempted dig of Hempstead utterly pointless.

      See: Bridgeview Fire

      • Agreed. “Harrison Red Bulls”, “Real Sandy”, “Commerce City Rapids”, “Foxborough Revolution”, we can go on and on…

    • The Fire organization is minor league. It’s been in last place the last two years and hasn’t made the playoffs in close to a decade.

      The moves made by this owner/”operator” make one question his allegiance to his own franchise or his competence.

      The team so badly screwed up getting Jermaine Jones — who wanted to come to Chicago — that the league had to engineer a face-saving coin toss, which violated its own rules on discovery players.

      The team is short players but yet sold their best midfielder for peanuts to a conference rival. It seems that every time a player leaves the Fire, they suddenly become better.

      The exodus of fans and season ticket holders shows that the skinflint ways are noticeable.

      Soccer fans who want to watch a winning team and feel part of a club — and not be treated as nuisance customers — can’t wait for Peter Wilt’s new team.

      • The Fire have some problems but they did make the playoffs in 2012 and from 1998-2009 only missed out once. Not that making the playoffs in MLS is that great an accomplishment (except for Toronto) but your claims of Chicago’s incompetence are somewhat exaggerated.

      • So, I’ll agree that AH is either inept or, well, something else. I still don’t know what happened with the failed JJ acquisition and seems more like a Yallop failure and Yallop was an AH hire.

        But what players have left and gotten better? Berry? Anibaba? Maybe you could make an argument for Husidic but I think he left to go oversees and then came back to LA. I really think fans are going to have to wait and see if the Jelvin Jones and Harry Shipp trades/sales are failures. We can certainly agree they were unpopular and risky, but only time will tell if they are failures.

        I look forward to the pressure that an NASL team will put on AH and the league office to correct the problems facing the Fire. I do think the Fire need to get their fecal matter together pretty quick or the NASL option might win over fans.

      • @ slowleftarm I know about the early years of success for the team. I was at nearly every home game. But this owner is not the same one as back then. Since he came along the team has tanked in every way. And that one “playoff” appearance in 2012 doesn’t really count because it was a play-in game to get into the playoffs.

      • Yes the Fire have been bad. But they did make the playoffs in 2012 (and it counts regardless of how you spin it) and they made it virtually every year before 2009 which means the ‘haven’t made the playoffs in a decade’ statement is just wrong. That was my point. The Fire are one of the saddest teams in MLS but even they aren’t so sad that a minor league team is going to threaten them.

    • The purpose of going into a major market like Chicago, and not under served markets, is for one reason. They want to be considered as a D1 League. In order to do so they will need teams on the west coast, and in cities with a certain population number.

    • All major cities, in countries that are serious about the game have multiple teams – which is everywhere – in a plethora of divisions that don’t compete against each other for fans.

      NASL will never be division 1 but that doesn’t matter. Divisions 2, 3, 4 etc. form the foundation for the growth of soccer for any nation, and so every league benefits from the other. Simply put, the more teams the merrier in the United States, an enormous and sports hungry nation. Only MLS thinks they are competing against MLS because MLS is insecure about their level of play and place in the world sports landscape. There should be a better relationship between NASL and MLS.

      NASL has a different business model but until now hasn’t been stealing players or fans away from MLS. Why hate this league so?

      Anyways, Chicago and MLS brought this on themselves. I visited Bridgeview once, soon after it opened. Never again, it was a horrible experience. The travel, the architecture, the lazy vibe inside the stadium that seemed to unfortunately translate to the players on the field.

      I am convinced that with a better stadium design AND location (both are required), the franchise wouldn’t be in bad shape at all, and they would be winning more. But now they can’t move the stadium or change it so the next best thing is an intercity rival.

      The Chicago Fire, like a bored only child, needs a sibling.

      • I think you have it backwards. The NASL and its fans hate MLS. They view it as a monopoly and have openly declared their intention to break its cartel. The vocal fans are against the American closed league / franchise model. They pine for promotion / relegation which is not very likely to ever occur in North America. MLS is only reacting to what they perceive as a threat, albeit minor, from an upstart minor league. Additionally, their negotiations with the Cosmos went nowhere, and after choosing the NASL Cosmos ownership spoke to the press about their decision that MLS wasn’t a good investment. I’m sure it’s left a bad taste in Don Garber’s mouth. I do not see any cooperation between the leagues. MLS is now linked with the USL and I’m betting the USL will eventually apply for D2 status. NASL will look to tie-up with D4 semi-pro/amateur NPSL.

      • The NASL in Chicago is a terrific idea. Wilt is a smart guy who can get things done within the city limits. Chicago can surely support two pro teams in the future…competition is a good thing.

        NASL will continue to grow and will eventually achieve D1 status (who says MLS can have a monopoly on D1 soccer in the USA?) – NASL can incorporate the NPSL into their league and set up a three division promotion/relegation system. This structure could accommodate 72 teams (24 in each division) and will probably include disenfranchised independent USL teams that do not make the MLS cut off of 28 teams (ie. Rochester, Pittsburgh, Charleston, among several others).

      • Only MLS thinks NASL is competing against it? Have you heard the crazy ramblings of the NASL commissioner? He certainly thinks they’re competing against MLS.

      • Right maybe so, that it’s all NASL’s fault but not everyone seems to agree on that. I’m indifferent, just saying this country needs a strong division 2 and it doesn’t matter what their business plan is, how many fans show up, or in what cities they play. You all throw around the term minor league in a derogatory way. I am a fan of this sport largely thanks to my town’s local team that only lasted for a few years but where John Harkes got his start and Paul Mariner captained, and I was a regular at games with no more than a 2000 other folks as well as at their camps.

        There was an energy, though, in the crowd and pretty good soccer on the field. It spread to the communities around. This sport is about localities. Regardless of their quarrels with other leagues, many NASL clubs have been around for a while and aren’t mere fabrications.

Leave a Comment