Top Stories

U.S. women fall for first time in group stage, will face Brazil in quarterfinals

U.S. Soccer Federation

The United States women's national team's smooth road in the FIFA Women's World Cup just got a whole lot bumpier.

Two defensive miscues turned into two first-half Sweden goals, and the United States fell in the group stage of the World Cup for the first time after a 2-1 loss to the European side in Wolfsburg, Germany. As a result, the Americans finished second in Group C and will be paired with Group D winner and powerhouse Brazil in the quarterfinals while group winner Sweden meets Australia.

After the United States fell behind, 2-0, Abby Wambach, who played 90 minutes despite battling Achilles tendonitis and sitting on a yellow card, pulled a goal back for the United States midway through the second half when a corner kick deflected off her shoulder.

That was not enough to offset Lisa Dahlkvist's 15th-minute penalty kick, which was granted after left back Amy LePeilbet committed a foul in the area.

LePeilbet was inadvertently at fault again for Sweden's second goal in the 35th minute, when Nila Fischer's free kick deflected off LePeilbet's leg and wrongfooted U.S. goalkeeper Hope Solo before finding the back of the net.

The United States, which played without starting right winger Heather O'Reilly (groin), generated a number of chances but couldn't convert. Lauren Cheney missed inches to the left on a shot from outside the area and then fired just over the crossbar on another volley attempt. Amy Rodriguez had a chance hit the woodwork when her chip from the top of the area clipped the top of the crossbar.

The loss was the second U.S. one to Sweden this year. Sweden won by the same scoreline at the Four Nations Tournament in China back in January.

——————

What did you think of the match? What personnel moves would you have made? How much of a chance do you give the U.S. women at beating Brazil and advancing?

Share your thoughts below.

Comments

  1. I love it when people say things like, “They lack creativity in the final third.” Translation: “They lack ball touch and skill in the final third.”

    In a recent interview, Anson Dorrance said just that. He feels women’s soccer in general in the U.S. over the last several years has failed to develop more skilled players on the ball. We play WAY too much long ball, often entirely bypassing the midfield. We rely too much on athleticism and size. That used to work in the 1990’s when other countries hadn’t really developed the women’s game like we had. However, they’ve now caught up, and I would argue a few countries such as Germany and Brazil have passed us by in the technical skill arena. Dorrance also added that the women need to emulate the men’s game more, and look to the better men’s club teams in the world to develop coaching and training strategy. I think he’s spot on. I actually heard Alex Morgan in a recent interview leading up to this WWC state “We’re really going to look to spray it long and wide, then cross it back in for headers and volleys.” Again, in the 90’s that worked, but in the present day that mentality is arcane and will prove unsuccessful.

    Reply
  2. Even Bob would have known after the first game that Le Peilbet (sp?) can’t hang. She’s more of a liability than Bornstein back there…

    Reply
  3. Agree. Solo set up a wall and expected the players to maintain position. She didn’t, she bailed. Sometimes in this game, you have to take a ball to the gut. But she moved and that is not what Solo expected based on Solo’s positioning.

    Reply
  4. Everything you said was okay except that the the crushing of Germany occured in Cleveland. And the good folk of Cleveland are entirely responsible for the result, not Pia.

    Reply
  5. Christian, my experience is limited to my geographical area and only about a dozen years but I have seen programs that run the gamit from playing-to-win to letting the kids be creative and figure it out for themselves. In the end after these kids become 18, the success of either program is fairly even so I believe there are strong arguments for different approaches. I favor a varied youth system. Let the MLS academies focus on letting the exceptional, creative players be themselves without the constraints of winning the match at 11 yrs old. But let the private clubs and academies do what they need to do to pay the bills, if thats winning the state tournament at U12 then so be it. There are some kids who in the long run are better off being taught what to do and how to play.

    Reply
  6. Plus all the money he helps generate pays for scholarships for poor kids to play on US soccer developmental academies which they otherwise couldnt afford to play for. Sorry dudes but soccer in the USA is not an easy ask, admit it, and admit that Sunil Gulati and Bob Bradley didnt make it that way. In addition fire Pia, who sucks, and hire Bob Bradley. His tactics would work in womens soccer.

    Reply
  7. I’m going to play the optimist and say that Brazil must be tearing out its collective hair in frustration in that now it has to play the US. Also, LePeilbet is having a terrible tournament. In the 1st half of North Korea she got torched as well.

    Reply
  8. pd: I wouldn’t say fire Bob Bradley. He’s doing what he can with what’s been given to him. What actually needs to be addressed is how our youth system is ran. youth coaches place a lot of importance on winning and tactics and it shows in our national teams. our national teams are very tactical, but offer very little in creativity and technical ability. what our youth needs are clubs that allow their players to play without fear. let the kids try to dribble 5 players, let them try and be inventive and creative without being yelled at for trying something new. hold training sessions where they need to find ways out of tight spaces and movement off the ball and when they get a bit older we can teach them more about tactics after they have developed the technical aspect of the game.

    Reply
  9. The USWNT is ranked #1 in the world, their expectations at the World Cup are far FAR higher than the USMNT at the World Cup. They are comparable to… the USMNT at the Gold Cup!

    The women barely even qualified for the WC despite being ranked #1! imagine if the happened to the men’s teams from Brazil, Germany, or Spain (who all have to qualify out of MUCH tougher federations).
    The women should have lost 3-1 today.
    USW vs Sweden is comparable to USM vs Panama (where the USM lost based on a penalty kick despite taking far more shots and missing a few
    sitters, sound familiar?)
    IF the USW lose to Brazil in the next round, they will have lost their group and then lost in the first elimination round, which is a worse result than the USM despite the massive difference in ranking (#1 vs 15-20 range for the men).
    IF the USW lose to Brazil in the next round, they will only have beaten North Korea and Colombia, two sorry women’s teams that are barely even comparable to a second tier CONCACAF men’s team. This is not the Colombian men, the women could only manage a 0-0 draw against North Korea when playing for their pride.
    The talent dropoff among women’s teams is far more steep than men’s, so this is more comparable to the men’s Gold Cup than World Cup.

    Reply
  10. The USMNT was playing in the Gold Cup, a tournament filled with mediocre teams, and lost to Panama, which at the time was ranked by Fifa at 67 in the world. The USWNT is now playing in the World Cup against the best teams in the world. The USWNT won against North Korea, a good team, and clobbered Columbia, a not so good team. Sweden is ranked Number 5 in the world, so can’t really compare that loss to the Panama disaster. Go USWNT!!!!

    Reply
  11. @RNG haha! I would like to see Chandler or Lichaj take the Left Back position and Cherundolo keep the Right Back spot until he’s lost his step. Then I’d like to see Chandler on one side and Lichaj on the other.

    Reply
  12. Sounds like they’ve got USMNT-itis…maybe they caught it from Jermaine Jones on his return trip to Germany? (ha)

    Reply
  13. Thanks John. I would say that Boxx played poor in the 1st half, but a bit better in the 2nd half. When things get late in the game and we’re behind, we need someone who can get the ball in the middle of the field and create. Boxx isn’t that player. She’s a “search and destroy” kind of player, but we need someone to get the ball and be dangerous with it going forward. Someone who can play a penetrating ball through the defense or play the unexpected ball. Everything from the U.S. is too predictable and Wambach is like a Ruud Van Nistlerooy type who can score goals, but needs to be set up in order to score, and we don’t have that playmaker in this tournament unfortunately.

    Reply
  14. I would much rather play Brazil in the Quarter-Final than the Final. They don’t play friendlies between major tournaments because their women have no funding from the Brazilian soccer federation so they often aren’t playing their best until late in tournaments.

    While we will have our work cut out for us with Brazil, Germany is clearly head and shoulders above any team in this tournament. I think on a good day we could beat Brazil, but I don’t think we can play with Germany.

    Reply
  15. Well, they got past Brazil in ’08 in the Olympic final after Brazil beat Germany 4-1 in the semi-final. The US can get by Brazil by playing compact and extremely organized soccer. It is certainly possible but they will have to contain Marta and Formiga.

    Brazil’s coach has been playing a deep sweeper up to this point. I wonder if they will come out like that against us?

    Reply
  16. Christian: very accurate coments. i’d add boxx had a poor game too. and… is Tony DiCicco applying for the coaching job again? Unlike his comments suggested, as well as other announcers, Sweden didn’t really have THAT good of a game. We just didn’t finish our chances. Cheney should’ve had two, ARod his the bar. the only gripe i continue to have is rampone in the back… it was yet another blind/poor give-away by her that setup the 2nd goal – after they played the ball back in with us outta shape.

    Reply
  17. Actually the oldest player on the backline is the fastest, namely Rampone. Buehler and LePeilbet need to have a seat. I would be tempted to play Tobin Heath or Megan Rapinoe as a left back (as radical as that sounds) against Brazil.
    And put Sauerbrunn in the middle with Rampone!

    Pia was a great hire after the Greg Ryan fiasco in ’07. We were able to win the Olympics (which is a full national team tournament for the women unlike the men). It looked hopeful when we crushed a full Germany side 4-0 in Columbus in ’10. However, we have played the same rigid formation, 4-4-2 and it doesn’t fit some of the more creative players in our player pool (like Casey Nogueira and Lindsay Tarpley).

    Today I thought we should have played 4-5-1 and dropped off from the beginning. We only needed a tie to go through and Sweden was expecting us to come out and play so they would have been surprised. But no, it was the same 4-4-2. Very predictable. We need to evolve with the women’s game and learn how to change our formation as the game warrants.

    We really miss Lori Chalupny who is one of the best left backs in the world. Too bad US Soccer wouldn’t clear her to play, even though the WPS doctors would.

    Reply
  18. I feel like you replied to the wrong post as your comments had nothing to do with what I was talking about.

    And yes, I’ve watched the team plenty since Pia’s been coach.

    Reply
  19. I definitely agree in that our WNT looks like our MNT. Both teams play with a midfielder who disrupts the opposition’s attack, but offers very little going forward. Both teams play in a one or two touch, play the way you face kind of mentality. That’s fine if you’ve got some creativity to the way you move the ball around, but our play is so incredibly predictable. No creativity going forward, no one unafraid to dare to do the unexpected. Everything is focused on playing simple. Playing simple is fine to get yourself out of tight spaces, but once the field opens up, there needs to be some creativity and both teams do not offer that.

    Reply
  20. I actually got the joke, that’s why I put “haha”. Pia Sundhage also has a history with Sweden. Maybe your sarcasm detector is broken… 🙂

    Reply
  21. Generally agree but I think Brazil is the team this go around and will exact their revenge to Beijing this weekend.

    Reply
  22. Par for the course with US Soccer this summer. Look like you don’t care give up early goals and allow strikers to run right past you. And can we hire a coach at any level that doesn’t dress like they are on the way to the 7-Eleven for a gallon of milk.

    Reply
  23. When we worked the ball in, we looked dangerous… so why did we stop doing that and go with the long feeds to nobody? Poor tactics, poor execution on the chances we had.

    Reply
  24. Have you actually watched our women play since Pia’s been coach?

    She’s the problem as our Nats coach.

    Bradley is fine as our Men’s Nats coach but Pia should have been canned after we beat Italia in the playoffs.

    Today’s result isn’t a surprise to me. I’m just glad it happened today as opposed to Saturday when I hope we do win but it could be a HUGE challenge. However, Brasil’s coach is also a knucklehead. Whichever team’s players decide to take matters into their own will win this match up. Simple as that.

    Reply
  25. The USA looked slow in the back line. I said when the roster came out, that there were too many players over the age of 30.
    I don’t see how USA will get past Brazil.

    Good Luck

    Reply
  26. I think your sarcasm detector may be broken.

    The coach is European also, she even has her own stamp in Sweden, how can we possibly lose??

    Reply
  27. LePeilbet shouldn’t play another minute in this tournament. She’s been a mistake machine in every game. She’s to this team what Jeff Agoos was to the 2002 men’s team.

    O’hara wasn’t much better when she came in for Rapinoe.

    Really though, all the USA needed to do was get more shots on target. Sweden’s keeper fumbled just about everything that came at her.

    Reply
  28. Fire Bradley mid-tournament because the US lost a group stage game for the first time ever!!!

    Fire Gulati for not hiring a European coach!!!!

    Reply
  29. LePeilbet unfortunately had a horrible showing in today’s game, even though the 2nd goal wasn’t her fault and 2nd half substitute O’Hara had a nightmare of a game as well. Julie Foudy commented on how this was a good substitution because of her pace, but unfortunately she looked like a deer in headlights and was unable to use her pace because she kept tripping herself up on the ball. She also had a nightmare of a volley late in the game that went off her shin. Hopefully the U.S. can show a bit more creativity in the final third, but their backline does need to play a lot better if they are going to hold Brazil’s attack.

    Reply
  30. How many national teams with overly conservative coaches and an inability to finish consistently does one country need?

    Reply
  31. They lacked sharpness for the majority of the game. From the start of the game I felt like they were playing not to lose, they didn’t exude a killer instinct. Their play reminded me of the USMNT, an inability to link more than 2-3 passes together. With that said, neither Sweden nor the US created many chances from the run of play. Horrid game to watch.

    Reply
  32. Poor year for USA soccer, Gulati is bad luck and has no interest in improving the game, just improving the amount of money in his pocket.

    Reply

Leave a Comment