Top Stories

Johnson wins MLS Goal of the Year

Will Johnson (ISIphotos.com)

                              Photo by ISIphotos.com

Real Salt Lake's Will Johnson was the winner of the 2008 Sierra Mist Goal of the Year for his flick and volley in a must-win game against FC Dallas on Oct. 18, the league announced today. Johnson's goal received the most votes in online fan voting.

Chris Wingert started the sequence by playing the ball to Johnson's feet at the top-right of the 18-yard box. The Toronto, Canada native flicked the up and hit a first-time strike past Dario Sala for the game-winner in a 3-1 victory against FC Dallas.

Here is the goal.

Ironically, that goal wasn't good enough to be goal of the week in Week 30. That honor belonged to Red Bulls goalkeeper Danny Cepero, who on his debut became the first MLS goalkeeper to score a goal when his 80-yard free kick bounced over the head of Columbus goalkeeper Andy Gruenbaum.

Cepero was one of five finalists, along with Columbus' Robbie Rogers, Geoff Cameron of Houston, Cuauhtemoc Blanco and Johnson.

What is my take? I can't see how Cepero couldn't have won. Johnson's strike was great, but how often do you see a goalkeeper score a goal? And on his debut? Sure he didn't do anything spectacular, and he was aided by the Giants Stadium FieldTurf and a stunning gaffe by Gruenebaum, but when you think back to the best goals of 2008, will you remember Cepero's amazing goal or a strike by Johnson, which is nice but something you'll likely to see a few times this year in various leagues around the world.

Then again I thought John Wolyniec should have won the honor in 2003.

What do you think? Share your thoughts below.

Comments

  1. Mario in SJ…

    That’s not all you said. You stated:

    “no pressure on him, nice roll of the ball to him, tip to raise ball and away it goes. Not a heck of allot of skill there”

    First of all, what does it mean to “raise” the ball? No one uses that term. “Away it goes” is just ignorant. “Not a heck of allot [sic] of skill there”? That shows your inexperience and lack of knowledge. Can other pros do that? Sure. With the time that Johnson had? Of course. But those pros have…you guessed it: Skill.

    Reply
  2. Cepero’s goal was a good candidate for ‘Goalkeeper Gaffe of the Year’. Or perhaps ‘Lucky Turf Bounce of the Year’. Or even ‘Most Overrated goal only because it was a Goalkeeper who scored it’. But it shouldn’t have even made Goal of the Week.

    Reply
  3. I am glad that the goal of the week showed not only individual skill, but effective team work. I’m sick of long-range and dead ball blasts in the goals of the week on TV. Just as boring as watching TV turning baseball into a game of “jacking one” and basketball into “slam dunks”. Let’s keep it the beautiful game.

    Reply
  4. Well, it looks like RSL’s fans have finally taken their revenge for their playoff loss to RBNY by stuffing the online ballot box for GOTY. This makes RSL the official Sierra Mist Whiny Sour Loser Crybaby Team of the Year.

    Reply
  5. Cepero’s goal? Really? C’mon Ives. That’s almost as bad as Jaime Moreno having a penalty in the goal of the week section last season.

    Reply
  6. Holy Crap! Thorrington at RB tonight? Cooper and Altidore starting? From the MNT blog:

    Guzan; Thorrington, Goodson, Parkhurst, Bornstein; Mastroeni (c), Clark, Adu, Kljestan; Cooper, Altidore

    Reply
  7. Actually, I think this was justice. The first goal by a keeper in MLS history deserves some props, but was fluky enough to not merit goal of the year.

    Anyways, with each passing performance by Cepero where he plays out of his mind, I do wonder if that lucky goal didn’t give him an extra shot of confidence that’s fueled this NY run to the MLS Cup.

    Reply
  8. so when Ives posted all those NYRB practice posts during the season nobody cared…but as soon as NY gets somewhere everyone is crying their eyes out about how this is a pro-NY blog?

    note: this post wasnt even posted by Ives.

    Reply
  9. Regardless of which was the best, do you really want someone abroad to pick up the MLS Goal of the Year video as a 30 second filler to the sports edition (assuming anyone would), and have them show the ball bouncing across Astroturf with American football lines painted on it?

    Reply
  10. @ko’d

    Never played FIFA 09 nor Pro soccer….

    I said “there was no pressure on him”.

    If you are the soccer expert you should know what that means!

    Reply
  11. Wow, another post that talks about the Red Bulls. I’m shocked.

    I think I’ll stay away from SBI for a couple of weeks until the Redbullgasm has stopped a little bit.

    Reply
  12. Rolfe’s volley against NYRB should have been up there with Johnson and Gallardo.

    Cepero’s goal was an embarrassment.

    Reply
  13. Johnson’ss goal is quality and a deserving winner. Saying Cepero’s goal should have won is silly. A lucky goal should not be goal of the year. A goal that was due to skil, athleticism, and/or great teamwork is what should win.

    Reply
  14. Mario in SJ–Lemme guess…

    You have never played competitive soccer, right? Sunday leagues don’t count. You must have no concept of how difficult it is to take a touch, turn, and drive the ball on goal from a volley and 20 yards out.

    Being good at FIFA 09 does not make you a soccer expert.

    Reply
  15. What? I didn’t even know that Will Johnson scored a goal… Seriously, a goalkeeper scoring a goal in his first game and it being the only goal by a keeper in 13 years of the league’s history is very memorable and I will certainly remember his goal over many of the others I have seen over the years… but let’s face it the fans can vote for their favorite goal ten times a day and is not really a serious award. Give it to Johnson and spread the awards around to the various MLS teams… Throw a bone to RSL!

    Reply
  16. Methinks somebody stuffed the ballot box.

    If skill is the reason for being selected then Johson’s goal was not a very hard one to achieve…no pressure on him, nice roll of the ball to him, tip to raise ball and away it goes. Not a heck of allot of skill there.

    Reply
  17. Wow..lot’s of hate for the Cepero goal out there. I have to agree with a lot of the arguments though. He didn’t mean for it to go in and it was a fluke so it couldn’t be goal of the year.

    In fact I hope that Garber is reading this and understands how much the fans want to get rid of accidental goals in the MLS. They could have a lie detector on field and if you didn’t mean for it to be a shot, the goal will be called back. I’m looking at you Frankie Hejduk (NY fans know what I mean-that was a cross and we all know it)

    Reply
  18. I call BS on all the “Exactly the image the league wants to project” garbage. You are obviously right that Cepero’s goal shows bad goalkeeping rather than skill. But there’s something to be said for mass appeal and marketability as well. The WOW factor put Cepero’s goal on highlight reels around the world. How many did Johnson’s make? You can judge aesthetics, fine. And the people have spoken based on all sorts of criteria, who knows what exactly. But this whole ‘better for league image’ thing, as if those of you who think that even have any CLUE what image the league needs to be succesful, or what image the league even wants, is ridiculous.

    I agree there’s certainly some real anti NY animosity going on lately due to our success, most of it unwarranted. But I don’t think anyone who cheers for NY/NJ should take it personally. It’s ingrained into the rest of the ignorant sports fans across America that NY fans are all pompous egotistical sore winners. It’s just we haven’t had to deal with it ever as Metro fans because we never won! lol Let’s hopefully get used to the rest of the American soccer landscape taking swipes at us. Not only does it betray their ignorance and jealousy at our sudden momentum only to be amplified 100x by our new stadium, but it also signals that we’ve arrived Metro fans. Embrace it. 🙂

    Reply
  19. oh and btw goal of the year is very subjective topic I dont even think it should be voted on. who really cares? its all about what you will remember from this MLS season. I will def remember Cepero’s goal for years to come, Johnsons goal? not so much..in fact I already dont remember it.

    Reply
  20. wow. since when did US fans turn into little girls. Ever since NY made into MLS cup everyone have become little whiny babies about everything. I haven’t seen this much crying since..well..ever.

    Reply
  21. I voted for Rogers’ and Johnson’s goals because they were legit. Yeah, everyone will remember Cepero’s goal, but it was unintended. They fact that it happened on gridiron football lines is another strike against it. Much love for Danny Cepero though!

    Reply
  22. Ok, we can all appreciate Cepero scoring, as a goalkeeper, in his debut.

    You said it yourself – it wasn’t anything spectacular. That should be the end of the discussion, but unfortunately it’s not.

    For some reason there are people like you who somehow think it’s more special to have someone screw-up and miss play a ball than someone actually demonstrating some level of skill. That’s not to say Cepero doesn’t have skill, but in terms of a goal scorer – well, how much you want to put down on him _ever_ scoring again?

    Cepero’s goal will go down in its own history – it’ll be included in those blooper reals which show the occasions where goal keepers score on open nets in 2nd half stoppage or when their opposing number makes a horrible mistake. It’ll forever be enshrined in MLS history as the first such goal. That’s its correct place in the scheme of things – but to say that it has any business being the Goal of the Year is simply maddening. Seriously, it almost makes me want to quit reading this blog.

    And as per the whole ‘something you’ll likely to see a few times this year in various leagues around the world.’ – That’s the point. By showing off a goal of such high quality it will help convey the message that MLS is stepping forward in terms of quality. Cepero’s goal would have told the rest of the world that MLS plays on horrible surfaces and has keepers who make horrible misjudgements. Honestly, what do you want to have a potential MLS fan see when they go out on YouTube and look for MLS highlights.

    Reply
  23. Sorry Dylan, but Cepero’s goal didn’t deserve to be top 5 for week 30, let alone the whole year. It was a fluke and it was ugly. It had nothing to do with skill or talent.

    In fact, I would say the Cepero goal was horrendous. First, Cepero played the ball beyond his target. Second, the ball bounced high on that awful astro-turf. Third and finally, the goalkeeper made a huge mistake. There was nothing “best” about that goal. Sorry.

    Reply
  24. Goals of the year should be based on skill, not luck. Personally, I voted for Robbie Rogers’ goal, but Johnson’s was very well taken.

    Reply
  25. Johnson’s goal was nasty but Cepero not winning had nothing to do with his goal. He lost it in the end because of the Jersey he wears. There was a Kansas City Wizards blog campaigning for fans to vote for anyone BUT Cepero because he’s a Red Bull.

    Meanwhile I didn’t even realize KC still had a team, and they care enough about another club to campaign against a guy for an award based purely around fun and fan interaction.

    Reply
  26. RBNY homer much Ives? Sure Cepero’s goal is memorable, but, for all the reason’s you listed, it was a fluke. A joke even. Johnson’s strike had skill and purpose behind it at the very least.

    Reply
  27. Agreed Cepero’s goal was a fluke (he even admitted it), but a goal’s a goal. We might never see another one like that in MLS.

    When you add that to Cepero’s performance in the playoffs, the guy is no longer a backup. If he continues to play at this level, Mr. Dimples is going places!

    In sum, I don’t think that Cepero’s goal should be the goal of the year. But don’t anyone say anything bad about him. I am an oversensitive NY fan. I feel pain too.

    Regardless, I am expecting Angel to come out with the unoffical goal of the year on Sunday.

    -Mike

    Reply
  28. I agree with most of those above me. Johnson’s goal deserved it, Gallardo’s goal should have been considered more strongly, and Cepero’s goal was a fluke.

    It is certainly not the first time a goalie has scored like that either. Paul Robinson anyone?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzBapEAfyOM

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_9IPenLuo8&feature=related

    and here is a collection that has some pretty hilarious ones:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suLdU3BRuGA

    Reply
  29. I think people made their point. For whatever reason however; we’ll all remember Cepero’s, why? not so common…let history be the judge.

    Reply
  30. I think it’s unfortunate that great team goals or build up play get lost in the Goal of the Week/Year, it’s all about the finish. Even the assist is rarely considered.

    Reply
  31. Gallardo’s strike was good, but if you’re comparing it to Van Basten’s then you’re completely insane. And Ives is crazy for thinking Cepero should have won. Johnson’s goal was pretty clearly the best from my perspective. And in an important match as well.

    Reply
  32. No way Cepero should have won. It was an entertaining goal to watch but like others said, goal of the year should be on purpose. I voted Johnson and am happy he won

    Reply
  33. Yeah, Cepero’s goal was entertaining, but too many other factors in play that he had nothing to do with. Mostly the turf, and terrible positioning. I love the Johnson goal, but Gallardo’s for me was a close second.

    Reply
  34. Thought it was a great goal. The people voted and he won cograts. I was fortune enough to see the goal live and I found it more dramatic since Will Johnson had proceeded the goal with about 5 bad passes to the other team. Until that goal I was really wondering why he was in the MLS. It was one of those “where did that come from” moments in sports.

    I think the greater memory of Cepero for this year will be how he has managed to pull out amazing efforts to take his team to the championship game. I think his goal might be a side note but not what his 08′ season is defined by in the history books.

    Reply
  35. I’m thrilled the fans didn’t vote Cepero’s goal as goal of the year. Yea, the Cepero goal was an amazing fluke goal. I don’t think you can give a goal of the year award to a play in which the player wasn’t even intending to shoot on goal, but ended up being lucky on a couple different aspects of the play (field turf, poor GK’ing)

    Reply
  36. I think the argument may be that cepero’s goal may be the most memorable goal of the season, but that doesn’t necessarily mean it is the best.

    Reply
  37. I’m biased as a DC United fan, but the best goal didn’t even make the final list.

    Marcello Gallardo’s volley (a-la Van Basten) was the best goal I’ve seen in MLS in quite a while. And unlike Cepero’s goal, he actually MEANT to do it.

    Reply
  38. Johnson’s goal was a sublime piece of skill. Exactly the image the league wants to project.

    Cepero’s goal was a flukey goal caused by luck, an eyesore field, and a bac backup goalkeeper. No Thanks!

    Reply

Leave a Comment