After being declined Division II status, the NASL has taken action against U.S. Soccer.
The NASL announced that it has filed an antitrust lawsuit against the U.S. Soccer Federation. Per the league’s press release, the complaint says that the USSF favors Major League Soccer, “the commercial business partner of the USSF,” and the United Soccer League over the NASL, and therefore has “violated federal antitrust laws.” The complaint targets the “anticompetitive ‘Division’ structure that divides men’s professional soccer for U.S.-based leagues based on arbitrary criteria”.
“The USSF left the NASL no choice except to file this lawsuit,” said Rocco Comisso, owner of the New York Cosmos and chairman of the league’s Board of Governors. “The NASL has taken this step to protect not just the league, but also the game, fans, and everyone with a stake in the future success of professional soccer leagues based in this country.”
The NASL used European league structures to defend their claim. According to the USSF’s criteria, “there are European clubs that have successfully operated for decades that would be considered ineligible for ‘Division I’ or even ‘Division II’ status due to arbitrary requirements like stadium capacity and market size,” they said. Additionally, the complaint points toward Soccer United Marketing, MLS’ marketing arm.
The NASL says it “only seeks injunctive relief” from the complaint, which was filed in Brooklyn federal court.
The lawsuit comes two weeks after news broke that the USSF had rejected NASL’s application to be a Division II league again next season.
Hearing on Twitter that the suit wasn’t approved unanimously, most notably NCFC and FC Edmonton.
Per the league’s press release, the complaint says that the USSF favors Major League Soccer, “the commercial business partner of the USSF,” and the United Soccer League over the NASL, and therefore has “violated federal antitrust laws.”
well, they’re probably right. and i would add, isn’t also rather obvious?
Forget about the label that the USSF puts on it, there’s nothing stopping the NASL from being D1 and competing head to head with MLS. Nothing except for a lack of commitment and a lack of money.
As an aside, doesn’t the Premier League have stadium standards that promoted teams have to comply with?
How can NASL even afford to pay for lawyers? Maybe some of their players are lawyers. 🙂
Merit based? If you get some time, help yourself to some reading about SUM’s relationship with USSF, Garber (a board member for the USSF) and why Garber/USSF were quite uneasy about a potential lawsuit from the USWNT that wanted to open the books on internal revenue within the federation.
—–
There’s a lot to snark at with NASL but throwing around the term merit implies integrity is present, and when you have the likes of Gulati and Garber it’s the antithesis of merit.
I understand that SUM-USSF-MLS are basically the same entity, and that there is a chicken/egg situation with tv contracts for NASL (which is where the real money for a league lies), but when the majority of NASL teams don’t have/can’t fill a 5000 seat arena do they really deserve Div I or even Div II status?
SR, very interesting observation…
Props to you for putting it out there like that.
For a league that has been doggedly trumpeting pro/rel from day one, they’ve always seemed to be very adverse to playing within a merit-based system.