Top Stories

MLS referees Geiger, Marrufo prepared for VAR’s introduction at World Cup


VAR is set to make its World Cup debut this summer, but it has been the source of contention the world round since its introduction. Many have doubted its usefulness at every turn, weighing each and every pro and con any time a referee elects to use video review. Those concerns, though, are not shared by those who will be using the technology in Russia next month.

I’m confident with everything that’s happened up to this point,” MLS referee Mark Geiger told SBI on Wednesday ahead of a trip to Russia to officiate at a World Cup for the second time. He was joined by the Professional Referee Organization general manager and World Cup veteran Howard Webb and colleague Jair Marrufo, who will joining Geiger in Russia for his first World Cup.

Geiger’s confidence comes from the training the referees selected by FIFA have had to complete to prepare for the tournament. “It’s a two year process,” Geiger said. In that time, the referees have attended several different types of seminars: on-field training with VAR, a VAR simulator, and then a theoretical seminar in which they “get everyone on the same page”.

The MLS referees are some of the most experienced when it comes to VAR, as they began training with it two-and-a-half years ago and using it last summer in matches. Other leagues around the world have followed suit, but the levels of comfort with the technology has concerned many critics of VAR in the weeks and months before the World Cup. At the beginning, Geiger and Marrufo admit, that was certainly the case.

The other referees “noticed that we were so calm about going through the motions,” Marrufo said. He added that those referees felt the need to “get it right really fast,” but it was not the most productive way to learn the VAR-related habits.

“Take your time,” he said, “look at the angles, get the perfect angle, and now show it to the referee.”

The endorsement of patience with regards to VAR is a seemingly controversial one given that many have wondered whether or not the system in place is quick enough to not disrupt the speed of play of the match. Webb, though, feels that once referees get used to the technology, using VAR becomes more efficient.

We’re getting quicker, we’re getting more efficient as well. There’s people, they are more comfortable. We’ve seen people do less checks because they’re more comfortable,” he said.

He also argues that the average amount of time video replay takes is not incredibly disruptive to the natural fast pace of soccer.

Webb came to the United States as PRO’s Manager of VAR Operations last year, and has been closely collecting data on its usage in MLS matches. According to him, the average time it takes to do a check is around one minute and 15 seconds, which is “additional time that we think stoppage would have taken anyway based on studies that we did in 2014″.

Additionally, the former Premier League referee noted that using VAR has not disturbed play at large. In his role with PRO, he has found that, over a stretch of 154 matches in MLS last season, 50 decisions were reviewed, making for an average use of VAR once every three matches. This is a ratio, he said, was matched by the Bundesliga during the 2017-18 season, when there were 50 checks during a stretch of 153 matches.

That suggests that we and they are making a similar number of errors or have a similar number of situations,” Webb said, “where the referee can’t quite get the right angle or the right information or there’s something off the ball.”

In addition to demonstrating that referees in different parts of the world are thinking similarly about using VAR, it also shows how often VAR should be used.

As Geiger added, the technology is only intended to be used for “clear and obvious” infractions.

Just say, ‘Is this clear and obvious?’ You can usually answer that very quickly,” Geiger said. “If you need multiple camera angles and look at it again and again and again, it probably doesn’t meet that threshold, so it’s time to let it go. We’re really looking for those ones that, you look at it the first time, it slaps you in the face. You look at it a second time just for confirmation, and really, you’re ready to go through the process and alert the referee at that point.”

The process, though, has been somewhat exclusionary to those in the stadium. While referees are communicating with each other and some higher-ups and those watching from home can eventually figure out the answers, those at the match end up confused as to why play has stopped, and hardly get their answers once play has started up. Last month, though, FIFA announced that they would share the footage referees were looking at on the stadium’s screens and include written explanations. Though Geiger, Marrufo, and Webb were familiar with the basics of the idea, they were unaware about some of the execution.

Marrufo and Geiger believe that the explanations will be short, and the group also thinks the explanations might pop up on screens in Russia in English.

I imagine it’s something similar to what we do,” Webb said. “We send a message out and say that the play is under review for a possible [infraction].”

A second message is then sent out once the decision is made, sharing the referee’s final decision.

Whatever reservations the rest of the world may have, the PRO trio believe that VAR makes a referee’s job much easier.

I imagine it gives you confidence on the field,” Webb said, “to know that you’ve got somebody to just check in that you’re not going to make a career changing error.”

It’s twofold,” Geiger added. “It’s getting the check complete, which tells you that you were correct in your decision, and then having the opportunity to fix that glaring error so it’s not sitting there in your mind for the rest of the game.”

The controversial nature of VAR, additionally, has not been felt by the refereeing community.

In honest conversations we’ve had with people, they’ve seemed comfortable with it in place,” Webb said. “If you give the match official the option to have VAR or take it away for that game, I’m pretty confident he’ll say, ‘No, leave it in place, please.’ I’d rather have it there than not because chances are I won’t need it two games out of maybe three.”

Webb also admitted that there might be some critics of VAR that may never be convinced of its benefits. Regardless, the referees assembled are ready for the task.

All the referees now have experience, whether it’s in training or in actual games, reffing a game with VAR,” Geiger said. “I think that we’ve gone in the right direction and I think that the people that are going to be in the VOR (video operations room) are going to be handle the pressure and the situations that are presented to them.”


  1. i agree with silverrey. this feels a bit rushed perhaps they should have waited until a few more leagues adopted var so more refs are comfortable with it, maybe wc 2022 would have been a better choice?

    • I would doubt it for a couple of reasons:

      1) It’s an American innovation based largely on Instant Replay from football…and we’re so popular (especially right now with Trumplomacy making us friends across the globe) that most everybody lines up to roundly pan ANYTHING American. I would posit this is particularly true when it comes to soccer, which has historically been the world’s game and not ours and I suspect there will be reflexive pushback against any American influence upon it…


      2) Russia. Which is gonna Russia. ANYBODY who thinks this is going to be a clean, uncorrupted, well-officiated affair has not been paying attention to either politics or any sport Russia is involved with…they tried to cheat at CURLING, for crying out loud. The VAR officials, frankly, need to be kept in Witness Protection, and well outside of Russia…but of course FIFA won’t do it that way, and they will likely be gotten to.

      I doubt it works like it should this time around.

      • I suspect we will see a decent amount of VAR controversy this time around. Not enough refs around the world are comfortable with it yet and you know a few of them are going to overreach or rush a decision.

  2. You know fans of El Tri had some “gracias a dios” when Geiger was announced. Most favorable ref for Mexico in the history of Concacaf, and I’m including ones from the 70s who were out and out paid off. I’m guessing refs from same confederation during world cup are disallowed from those games, but dont be surprised if the game he calls involving Germany finds them with just 10 men on field for the last 60 plus min

  3. Glad to see this article since I’ve been wanting to say some good words about MLS officiating. I can remember the times past when officiating at MLS games was, at best, hit and miss. Sometimes is was just out and out bad. However, over the last 4 or 5 years or so, the officiating has become, IMHO, first rate. Management at PRO is to be congratulated for the job they have done in imp[roving their product. The hiring of Howard Webb was incredibly smart on their part as he has been one of the best in the world. It’s nice going into the game knowing that you have a referee who is unlikely to screw things up. You don’t always remember their names, but you know who they are. In CONCACAF matches, there’s this skinny Jamaica referee I’m always happy to see officiating at USMNT games. In the past, internationally there was that Italian bald guy who officiated at least one WC final and he was always outstanding. Anyways, kudos to Geiger, Marrufo and their colleagues.


Leave a Comment